Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-29 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 29.07.2011 00:26, schrieb Henri Yandell: Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang. JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and Proxy need updating. Configuration currently still targets Java 1.4. I would

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-28 Thread Henri Yandell
That sounds like 'yes we should do that asap' to me :) On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > Very nearly so, yes.  :) > > Matt > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch? >> >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benso

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-28 Thread Matt Benson
Very nearly so, yes. :) Matt On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch? > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote: >> I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about >> the 1.x trunk. >> >> Matt >> >> On

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-28 Thread Henri Yandell
Time to flip the 1.x trunk and 2.0 branch? On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about > the 1.x trunk. > > Matt > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> Note that Chain isn't really depending on i

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-28 Thread Matt Benson
I did the proxy 2.0 branch; not sure there's a reason to worry about the 1.x trunk. Matt On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on > myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang. > > JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgrad

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-28 Thread Henri Yandell
Note that Chain isn't really depending on it. It depends on myfaces-api and then excludes commons-lang. JCS, Flatfile and Pipeline are all upgraded in SVN. Configuration and Proxy need updating. Hen On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > For the record, and so we can consider w

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-28 Thread Henri Yandell
Go for it :) On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:46 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > You know, it would probably be nice for our end users to note what > this email contained for our home page: > > 1) A clear explanation that Commons Lang 3 and 2/1 can co-exist side > by side and that upgrading to 3 doesn't mean

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Paul Benedict
You know, it would probably be nice for our end users to note what this email contained for our home page: 1) A clear explanation that Commons Lang 3 and 2/1 can co-exist side by side and that upgrading to 3 doesn't mean you won't still need previous versions. 2) What we know other Apache Commons

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Matt Benson
Or maybe I won't hit [flatfile], since I see you've just done so. ;) Thanks! Matt On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Matt Benson wrote: > Good point.  I'll go ahead and update [flatfile].  IIRC the proxy 2 > branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release. > > Matt > > On Wed,

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Matt Benson
Good point. I'll go ahead and update [flatfile]. IIRC the proxy 2 branch already uses [lang] 3; I'll update that to use the release. Matt On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the > following components depend on L

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Henri Yandell
For the record, and so we can consider what needs a release, the following components depend on Lang: * Chain * Configuration * JCS * Proxy and in the Sandbox: * Flatfile * Pipeline Hen On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict wrote: > Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Paul Benedict
Yes. The reason the package name was changed was so that 1.x-2.x and 3.0 can coexist together in an application. Since Commons Configuration relies on a previous version, as Stephen said, you will need both dependencies. On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > You will need b

Re: [LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Stephen Colebourne
You will need both versions of commons-lang, the new and the old. Stephen On 27 July 2011 11:17, Rohan Kadam wrote: > Hi All, > > We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package > name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache > website t

[LANG] Commons Lang 3.0

2011-07-27 Thread Rohan Kadam
Hi All, We have upgraded our common lang jar to 3.0 version. We have replaced package name "lang" to "lang3". But since it has already been mentioned on apache website that Common Lang 3.0 is not backward compatible, we are facing some compilation issues. After replacing Apache Commons Lang 2.