Re: [JEXL] remaining binary incompatibilities in 2.1

2011-12-04 Thread sebb
On 3 December 2011 14:52, henrib wrote: > If the last hurdle to binary compatibility is replacing DebugInfo by > JexlInfo, by all means, replace it! OK, will do. > Nice analysis and great result. Thanks. At times it looked as though the changes were too great to restore compatibility, but I thi

Re: [JEXL] remaining binary incompatibilities in 2.1

2011-12-03 Thread henrib
If the last hurdle to binary compatibility is replacing DebugInfo by JexlInfo, by all means, replace it! Nice analysis and great result. Thanks for your efforts, Cheers Henrib Ps any comment on the difference between stability and usability and possible solutions, cd release process post? -- View

[JEXL] remaining binary incompatibilities in 2.1

2011-12-03 Thread sebb
The Jexl 2.0 branch now has only a few binary incompatibilities reported by Clirr. According to the JLS [1], adding methods to an interface does not break *binary* compatibility; however of course it will break source compatibility. Either Clirr is not distinguishing the binary/source cases, or it