Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Great. Thanks for taking the time to do this! Gary On Oct 5, 2010, at 21:45, "Tim Sneddon" wrote: > On 10/06/2010 07:23 AM, sebb wrote: >> On 2 October 2010 16:11, sebb wrote: >> These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. >> >> I don't know if there is a workround. >

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread Siegfried Goeschl
Hi folks, one note regarding the regression tests - check if there are still background processes running because they will break the next test run as well. Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl On 10/6/10 6:19 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 October 2010 05:44, Tim Sneddon wrote: On 10/06/2010 07:23 AM, sebb

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread sebb
On 6 October 2010 05:44, Tim Sneddon wrote: > On 10/06/2010 07:23 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 2 October 2010 16:11, sebb  wrote: >> These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. >> >> I don't know if there is a workround. > > I know some time ago I had some fixes to the OpenVMS s

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread sebb
On 6 October 2010 12:53, James Carman wrote: > So it's not a blocker then if we want to release? No, I don't think it's a blocker, though we probably need to make the restrictions clearer. But of course it would be nice to have a solution ... > On Oct 6, 2010 7:21 AM, "sebb" wrote: >> On 6 Oct

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread James Carman
So it's not a blocker then if we want to release? On Oct 6, 2010 7:21 AM, "sebb" wrote: > On 6 October 2010 10:36, James Carman wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:23 PM, sebb wrote: >>> These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. >>> >>> I don't know if there is a workroun

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread sebb
On 6 October 2010 10:36, James Carman wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:23 PM, sebb wrote: >> These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. >> >> I don't know if there is a workround. >> > > Is this something new?  Did previous versions of exec pass these tests > on OpenVMS?

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-06 Thread James Carman
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:23 PM, sebb wrote: > These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. > > I don't know if there is a workround. > Is this something new? Did previous versions of exec pass these tests on OpenVMS?

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-05 Thread Tim Sneddon
On 10/06/2010 07:23 AM, sebb wrote: On 2 October 2010 16:11, sebb wrote: These are all due to failure to destroy the subprocess on OpenVMS. I don't know if there is a workround. I know some time ago I had some fixes to the OpenVMS support. Sadly I had to move on to something else before I go

Re: [EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-05 Thread sebb
On 2 October 2010 16:11, sebb wrote: > I've tried running my modified copy of the test cases. > The testExecuteWatchdogSync() also hangs on OpenVMS. Not sure where to > put the timeouts for that yet, so I tried disabling it. > > I now get the following errors/failures: > > Time: 88.365 > There wer

[EXEC] OpenVMS failures

2010-10-02 Thread sebb
I've tried running my modified copy of the test cases. The testExecuteWatchdogSync() also hangs on OpenVMS. Not sure where to put the timeouts for that yet, so I tried disabling it. I now get the following errors/failures: Time: 88.365 There were 4 errors: 1) testExecuteWatchdogAsync(org.apache.