I will file the report later today or tomorrow. Please let me know if you
have any suggestions.
## Description:
The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java focused
reusable libraries and components
## Issues:
There are no issues requiring board attention.
## Description
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 00:06, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le lun. 7 juin 2021 à 00:03, Ralph Goers a écrit
> :
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 6, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > >
> > > Le dim. 6 juin 2021 à 14:54, Gary Gregory a
> > > écrit :
> > >>
> > >> Here is the draft I plan on su
Le lun. 7 juin 2021 à 00:03, Ralph Goers a écrit :
>
>
>
> > On Jun 6, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >
> > Le dim. 6 juin 2021 à 14:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >>
> >> Here is the draft I plan on submitting:
> >>
> >> ## Description:
> >> The mission of Apache Commons is the creat
> On Jun 6, 2021, at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>
> Le dim. 6 juin 2021 à 14:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>>
>> Here is the draft I plan on submitting:
>>
>> ## Description:
>> The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java focused
>> reusable libraries and compon
Le dim. 6 juin 2021 à 21:13, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> >"Most of the activity comes
> from PRs on GitHub" is particularly "healthy".
>
> Please explain;
Hypothesis:
"Most of the activity comes from [non-committers]"
is a consequence of
"No new committers"
In the past, there was some (inform
If I recall correctly, there are actual health metrics that the ASF uses as a
standard, but I can’t seem to dig them up. That said, we can say we have
healthy PR engagement and disregard project health generally because how people
index for that depends on the person.
All that said, Commons se
>"Most of the activity comes
from PRs on GitHub" is particularly "healthy".
Please explain; especially considering all of our components are mirrored
on GitHub and GH provides a better UI and processes than we do on apache.org
.
Gary
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021, 14:45 Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Le dim.
Le dim. 6 juin 2021 à 14:54, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> Here is the draft I plan on submitting:
>
> ## Description:
> The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java focused
> reusable libraries and components
>
> ## Issues:
> There are no issues requiring board attention."
>
Here is the draft I plan on submitting:
## Description:
The mission of Apache Commons is the creation and maintenance of Java focused
reusable libraries and components
## Issues:
There are no issues requiring board attention."
## Membership Data:
Apache Commons was founded 2007-06-19 (14 years a
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 8:47 PM Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 14, 2019, at 7:48 AM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:20 PM James Carman >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Fair enough. And very good point. It only came to mind for me,
> because of
> >> the work stuff. Thanks
>
> On Jun 14, 2019, at 7:48 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:20 PM James Carman
> wrote:
>
>> Fair enough. And very good point. It only came to mind for me, because of
>> the work stuff. Thanks
>>
>
> YW. I will post to board@ later today.
Generally many thanks for
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 1:20 PM James Carman
wrote:
> Fair enough. And very good point. It only came to mind for me, because of
> the work stuff. Thanks
>
YW. I will post to board@ later today.
Gary
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:51
Fair enough. And very good point. It only came to mind for me, because of
the work stuff. Thanks
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 9:09 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:51 AM James Carman
> wrote:
>
> > SCXML seems to have stalled quite a bit. I’m not trying to throw shade
> or
> >
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:51 AM James Carman
wrote:
> SCXML seems to have stalled quite a bit. I’m not trying to throw shade or
> anything. People get busy and just don’t have time for open source work.
> There have been quite a few folks inquiring about it as of lately, but not
> a ton of trac
SCXML seems to have stalled quite a bit. I’m not trying to throw shade or
anything. People get busy and just don’t have time for open source work.
There have been quite a few folks inquiring about it as of lately, but not
a ton of traction. My colleagues at work are interested in using it, so
I’
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:30 AM James Carman
wrote:
> Should we mention the issues with SCXML2?
>
Hi James,
Would you care to be more specific? What text would you include?
Gary
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:25 AM Gary Gregory
> wrote:
>
> > ## Description:
> > - Apache Commons is an Apache
Should we mention the issues with SCXML2?
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 8:25 AM Gary Gregory wrote:
> ## Description:
> - Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
>Java components.
>
> ## Issues:
> - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
>
> ##
## Description:
- Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
Java components.
## Issues:
- There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
## Activity:
- Activity is good with the release of 8 components.
## Health report:
- While we previously repo
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 1:57 PM sebb wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 19:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > I will send this soon, feedback welcome.
> > -
> > ## Description:
> > - Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
> > Java
> >components.
> >
> > ## Issues:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 19:49, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I will send this soon, feedback welcome.
> -
> ## Description:
> - Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
> Java
>components.
>
> ## Issues:
> - There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
>
I will send this soon, feedback welcome.
-
## Description:
- Apache Commons is an Apache project focused on all aspects of reusable
Java
components.
## Issues:
- There are no issues requiring board attention at this time.
## Activity:
- Activity is good with the release of 6 components.
##
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>
> > On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:05 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >
> > Hello Gary,
> >
> >> Am 13.06.2017 um 03:23 schrieb Gary Gregory :
> >>
> >> Any and all feedback is welcome. I would like to send the report in 24
> >> hours.
> >>
> >> ## Desc
> On Jun 13, 2017, at 2:05 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Hello Gary,
>
>> Am 13.06.2017 um 03:23 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>>
>> Any and all feedback is welcome. I would like to send the report in 24
>> hours.
>>
>> ## Description:
>>
>> - The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of r
Another thing I'll mention:
- We are starting to add testing with IBM Java 8 to Travis-CI builds.
Gary
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:28 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Gary,
>>
>> > Am 13.06.2017 um 03:23 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>>
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 11:05 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
> Hello Gary,
>
> > Am 13.06.2017 um 03:23 schrieb Gary Gregory :
> >
> > Any and all feedback is welcome. I would like to send the report in 24
> > hours.
> >
> > ## Description:
> >
> > - The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects
Hello Gary,
> Am 13.06.2017 um 03:23 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Any and all feedback is welcome. I would like to send the report in 24
> hours.
>
> ## Description:
>
> - The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> components.
>
> - The Apache Commons components are wid
Any and all feedback is welcome. I would like to send the report in 24
hours.
## Description:
- The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
- The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both
within
Apache and without. Any ASF committer can c
On Dec 24, 2016 9:16 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:06:46 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Dec 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
>
> Hi Gary.
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the information
>> a
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 09:06:46 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Dec 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Gilles"
wrote:
Hi Gary.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the
information
about Commons Math into the health section which I feel
On Dec 24, 2016 8:21 AM, "Gilles" wrote:
Hi Gary.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
> I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the information
> about Commons Math into the health section which I feel is more
> appropriate. I'll send this in very soon.
>
D
Hi Gary.
On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 10:08:09 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the
information
about Commons Math into the health section which I feel is more
appropriate. I'll send this in very soon.
Did you send a final version? [I didn't see a copy
I've rejiggered the heart of the report to move some of the information
about Commons Math into the health section which I feel is more
appropriate. I'll send this in very soon.
## Issues:
- There are no issues that requires the boards attention this quarter.
## Activity:
- The project is activ
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes
wrote:
> We had waited for Infra to do the rename/move of the commons rdf git
> repository; that was just completed two days ago.
>
>
> I did not republish site yet from src as half the pages would have many
> broken links to the new repo; in s
FYI: I will omit the "Mailing list activity" section since it does not
provide anything interesting for the board and does not need any
explanation.
Gary
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
>
> ## Description:
> Th
Hi Stian,
no hurry. Gary mentioned in his original proposal that commons-rdf is on its
way. We just give an overview of our activities. We can mention the final
state in the next report again.
Cheers,
Jörg
Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> We had waited for Infra to do the rename/move of the commo
We had waited for Infra to do the rename/move of the commons rdf git
repository; that was just completed two days ago.
I did not republish site yet from src as half the pages would have many
broken links to the new repo; in src/site it is already updated. Sergio was
looking at ways to ensure the
On 15/12/16 11:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 14/12/16 23:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
## Activity:
- The project is active with 6 releases this reporting period. We
released
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>
> On 14/12/16 23:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
>>
>
>
> ## Activity:
>> - The project is active with 6 releases this reporting period. We
>> released
>> one new component Commo
On 14/12/16 23:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
## Activity:
- The project is active with 6 releases this reporting period. We released
one new component Commons RNG 1.0. Commons Math still feels in semi-limbo
and
now depends on Common
Hi Gary.
Sorry for top-posting, but as said: about to loose connectivity.
I'm not saying that "Commons" is all black.
Just that my experience in the last has been a lot of time invested,
especially to argue against the flood of non-constructive criticism
(and no fun at all).
I thank everyone wh
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Gilles
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:06:35 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
>>
>> ## Description:
>> The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
>> components.
>>
>> The
Hi.
On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:06:35 -0800, Gary Gregory wrote:
Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
## Description:
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both
within
Looks good!
Though your email sig has a bunch of extra slashes in the URLs for some
reason. ;)
On 14 December 2016 at 17:06, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
>
> ## Description:
> The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Ja
Hi All: I am requesting your feedback before I send this off.
## Description:
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both within
Apache and without. Any ASF committer can commit to Apache Commo
All fixed. Thank you Sebb.
Gary
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:18 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 10 December 2015 at 02:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Here is what I plan to send tonight:
> >
> > [REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report 2015-12-09
> >
> > The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusabl
On 10 December 2015 at 02:56, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Here is what I plan to send tonight:
>
> [REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report 2015-12-09
>
> The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> components.
>
> The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both
Hello Gary,
2015-12-10 3:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> Here is what I plan to send tonight:
>
> [REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report 2015-12-09
>
> The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> components.
>
> The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 12/9/15 7:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Here is what I plan to send tonight:
> >
> > [REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report 2015-12-09
> >
> > The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> > components.
> >
> > The Apac
On 12/9/15 7:56 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Here is what I plan to send tonight:
>
> [REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report 2015-12-09
>
> The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> components.
>
> The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both within
> A
Here is what I plan to send tonight:
[REPORT] Apache Commons Board Report 2015-12-09
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both within
Apache and without.
The last report was on September 9
I submitted the report to the board.
Gary
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> [Feedback welcome. Thank you, Gary]
>
> The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> components.
>
> The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both
> wi
> >> News
> >>
> >>- 2014-12-8: VOTE passed to allow all Apache committers to commit
> to
> >>Apache Commons.
> >
> >
> > I havent seen such a vote in the archive
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-
> dev/201411.mbox/brows
> > er
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
>> News
>>
>>- 2014-12-8: VOTE passed to allow all Apache committers to commit to
>>Apache Commons.
>
>
> I havent seen such a vote in the archive
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201411.mbox/browser
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mb
> News
>
>- 2014-12-8: VOTE passed to allow all Apache committers to commit to
>Apache Commons.
I havent seen such a vote in the archive
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201411.mbox/browser
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/commons-dev/201412.mbox/browser
Jan
[Feedback welcome. Thank you, Gary]
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both within
Apache and without.
The last report was in early September 9 2014.
No issues require board attention at
about reporting about the [math] git migration?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Benedikt
>>
>> 2014-09-08 16:07 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
>>
>> > Please provide feedback as you see fit. I'll send this out in 24 hours.
>> >
>> >
>> &g
see fit. I'll send this out in 24 hours.
> >
> >
> > [DRAFT] Apache Commons Board Report, September 9 2014
> >
> >
> > The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
> > components.
> >
> >
> > The Apache Commons compo
Hello Gary,
how about reporting about the [math] git migration?
Regards,
Benedikt
2014-09-08 16:07 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> Please provide feedback as you see fit. I'll send this out in 24 hours.
>
>
> [DRAFT] Apache Commons Board Report, September 9 2014
>
>
>
Please provide feedback as you see fit. I'll send this out in 24 hours.
[DRAFT] Apache Commons Board Report, September 9 2014
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are widely used in many projects, both within
Apach
Nice work!
Send from my mobile device
> Am 04.06.2014 um 17:41 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Hi All,
>
> It's that time again.
>
> Please provide feedback for our Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014,
> provided below.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> -
>
> Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014
>
+1
Thomas
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It's that time again.
>
> Please provide feedback for our Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014,
> provided below.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> -
>
> Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014
>
> The Apache Commons projec
Le 04/06/2014 17:41, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> It's that time again.
>
> Please provide feedback for our Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014,
> provided below.
It looks find to me, thanks Gary.
Luc
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> -
>
> Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014
>
> Th
Hi All,
It's that time again.
Please provide feedback for our Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014,
provided below.
Thank you,
Gary
-
Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014
The Apache Commons project focuses on all aspects of reusable Java
components.
The Apache Commons components are w
If there are no further changes I will submit the board report later
today.
cheers
--
Torsten
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:52 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:52 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > >
> > > > For
On 12/03/2008, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > >
> > > For components that are targetted at Java 1.4+, I'd say drop the M1
> > > build files ent
On 3/12/08, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > For components that are targetted at Java 1.4+, I'd say drop the M1
> > build files entirely, as IMO they don't offer any benefit, and are
> > confusing unless
On 12.03.2008, at 14:56, Matt Benson wrote:
--- Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new
PMC members as
usual? :-)
Not sure whether I'm being overly formal... proposed
edits; I'll commit if given approval:
Please commit. No need to send aro
--- Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new
> PMC members as
> usual? :-)
Not sure whether I'm being overly formal... proposed
edits; I'll commit if given approval:
Index: board-2008-03.txt
=
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:29 PM, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Couple of things missing:
> >
> > - Gary Gregory joined the PMC
> > - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
> >
> > Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 12.03.2008, at 13:18, Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> > Couple of things missing:
> >
> > - Gary Gregory joined the PMC
>
> I knew it :-D
>
>
> > - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
>
> But that one is listed
Yes sor
On 12.03.2008, at 13:18, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Couple of things missing:
- Gary Gregory joined the PMC
I knew it :-D
- FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
But that one is listed
Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did
one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSG
On 12/03/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Couple of things missing:
>
> - Gary Gregory joined the PMC
> - FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
>
> Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did
> one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSGi metadata - I doubt I
Couple of things missing:
- Gary Gregory joined the PMC
- FileUpload 1.2.1 was released
Another point, perhaps not relevant to the report - although we did
one m1 release (Pool 1.4) that included OSGi metadata - I doubt I will
do that manually again, so probably releases will only include OSGi
Anything I missed or got wrong? Maybe I missed new PMC members as
usual? :-)
Henry, did I cover the Incubator idea correctly? Feel free to change
directly in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/pmc/commons/reports/board
...or let me know.
cheers
--
Apache Commons Board Report, March 20
Corrections? Additions?
cheers
--
Torsten
Apache Commons Board Report, November 2007
Summary
===
o Question has come up whether commons codec is thread safe
- needs better documentation
o More activity on commons jexl
- roadmap towards 2.0
o Discussion about moving fam (
Looks good to me.
Hen
On 10/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Something to add?
>
> --
> Apache Commons Board Report, October 2007
>
> Summary
> ===
>
> o We got a fair amount of "not the usual suspects" bringing up
> issues and suggestion.
> o Proxy moved from sandbox to
Something to add?
--
Apache Commons Board Report, October 2007
Summary
===
o We got a fair amount of "not the usual suspects" bringing up
issues and suggestion.
o Proxy moved from sandbox to proper. No release yet.
o TSU encryption notification has been sent for Apache Commons OpenPGP
It's about time again ...but frankly speaking - did anything really
happen?
Felt like traffic picked up a bit on the lists. Interest in reviving
compress.
What else?
--
Apache Commons Board Report, September 2007
Summary
===
o A couple of new people on the scene that expressed their
Anything else? ...otherwise I'll send it through tomorrow.
cheers
--
Torsten
--
Apache Commons Board Report, August 2007
Summary
===
o Move to TLP has been performed
o Agreed on committer voting rules (voting in private, public
invite)
o Discussed non-java components (pragmatic ap
On 8/13/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Community
> > =
> >o Agreed on committer voting rules (?)
> > 1. ask on private
> > 2. propose on private
> > 3. vote on private
> > 4. ask the prospect i
Henri Yandell wrote on Monday, August 13, 2007 10:28 PM:
> On 8/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was off for vacation and was (unexpectedly) completely offline for
>> the whole time ...so we got to get this sent to the board quickly -
>> sorry.
>
> No rush - the meeting's been
On 8/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (-> at cocoon we do 2.-3. on the dev list which works out fine -
> my 2 cents)
I'll spend two cents more to second this...
--
"Besides, manipulating elections is under penalty of law, resulting in
a preventative effect against manipul
On 8/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was off for vacation and was (unexpectedly) completely offline for
> the whole time ...so we got to get this sent to the board quickly -
> sorry.
No rush - the meeting's been pushed back to the 29th.
>
> Please add your comments - I'll writ
I was off for vacation and was (unexpectedly) completely offline for
the whole time ...so we got to get this sent to the board quickly -
sorry.
Please add your comments - I'll write it up nicely once we have all
input gathered.
--
Apache Commons Board Report, August 2007
Summary
===
86 matches
Mail list logo
