On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Niall Pemberton wrote:
>>
>> Yes I think saying 3 committers is a bit mis-leading - since Sanselan
>> entered the incubator Carsten has made the 2nd most commits but that
>> is only 16 commits and he hasn't committed for over a year. Also
Niall Pemberton wrote:
>
> Yes I think saying 3 committers is a bit mis-leading - since Sanselan
> entered the incubator Carsten has made the 2nd most commits but that
> is only 16 commits and he hasn't committed for over a year. Also the
> last commit on the project was over 3 months ago:
>
> ht
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>
>
>
> --- On Wed, 4/22/09, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>> From: Carsten Ziegeler
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library
>> To: "Commons Developers List"
>> Date: Wednesday, Apr
--- On Wed, 4/22/09, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> From: Carsten Ziegeler
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Sanselan as a Commons library
> To: "Commons Developers List"
> Date: Wednesday, April 22, 2009, 4:42 AM
> Phil Steitz wrote
> > We have a rule of thumb her
Phil Steitz wrote:
> Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>> Phil Steitz wrote
>>
>>> We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from
>>> the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to
>>> work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active
>>>
Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Phil Steitz wrote
We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from
the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to
work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active
involvement). This is not a hard and
Phil Steitz wrote
> We have a rule of thumb here that in order to graduate a component from
> the sandbox to commons proper, we need to have 3 committers willing to
> work on it (which means more than just "oversight" - more like active
> involvement). This is not a hard and fast rule, but somethi
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Phil,
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The last item before graduation is activity and diversity, which are
lacking. There were a few developers during the project but now we
have only one active developer. And it's not clear that we will be
able any
Hi Phil,
On Apr 18, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Phil Steitz wrote:
The last item before graduation is activity and diversity, which
are lacking. There were a few developers during the project but now
we have only one active developer. And it's not clear that we will
be able any time soon to attract
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi,
The Sanselan podling [1] has been incubating since 2007 and has
achieved most of the goals in incubation:
Code has been released [2] according to the incubator release guidelines
Status is up to date [3]
Community mailing lists are responded to promptly [5]
JIRA iss
Hi, Craig,
I'm personally not sure that commons would be the best fit for
Sanselan. Despite the name, I'd consider the commons of xmlgraphics
(despite the name, this is not only about XML) a better place.
Nevertheless, I'd vote in favour of Sanselan, if it comes to that.
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at
11 matches
Mail list logo
