Nice to have Joerg,
every contributions is always welcome :)
Feel free to add that feature, I'd like to add the Guice integration
as well since it is a common pattern I've been repeating over the time
:P
Have a nice day, all the best!!!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99so
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> looks there are not objections on adding 3rd parties integration
> modules on [Discovery], I'll take care on it as soon as I receive my
> new laptop with working development environment :)
Is it all about to get a Java SPI that supports arguments for the cto
Hi all guys,
looks there are not objections on adding 3rd parties integration
modules on [Discovery], I'll take care on it as soon as I receive my
new laptop with working development environment :)
Thanks a lot for your feedbacks Matt!!!
Have a nice day, all the best,
Simo
http://people.apache.org
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Matt!!!
> I still continue preferring Discovery over Java6 ServiceLoader just
> for a small reason: it allows iterating over Classes instead of
> Instances, that makes easier integration with DI/IoC frameworks.
> Indeed, with the Guice m
Hi Matt!!!
I still continue preferring Discovery over Java6 ServiceLoader just
for a small reason: it allows iterating over Classes instead of
Instances, that makes easier integration with DI/IoC frameworks.
Indeed, with the Guice module, like shown in the link in my first
email, I let instantiatin
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> it sounds indeed reasonable, thanks for your feedbacks!
> Moreover what is you are suggesting is what we did in BVAL...
Yes, exactly like bval... :)
> Do you see any risk on splitting current Discovery project structure
> in mu
Hi Matt,
it sounds indeed reasonable, thanks for your feedbacks!
Moreover what is you are suggesting is what we did in BVAL...
Do you see any risk on splitting current Discovery project structure
in multi module?
Many thanks in advance, have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Simone Tripodi
wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> lately in my projects I've been frequently repeating the pattern
> described in [1], so, to avoid useless c'n'p I would propose to
> provide an already compiled module that makes easier the Google Guice
> integration with Disc
Hi all guys,
lately in my projects I've been frequently repeating the pattern
described in [1], so, to avoid useless c'n'p I would propose to
provide an already compiled module that makes easier the Google Guice
integration with Discovery.
Google Guice could be provided as a 'optional' or 'provided
