Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2013-01-07 Thread William Speirs
> > If the entire API is to change, then I agree one might as well treat > it as a completerly new library and change groupId/package name. > Users could either stick with the current design or rewrite to use the > new design. > I guess the question is, are you in favor of changing a great deal of

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2013-01-06 Thread sebb
On 6 January 2013 14:50, Bill Speirs wrote: > In thinking about it more (I haven't started implementing anything yet), I > don't see why we would want to drop support for positional parameters... we > could easily handle both. (Both in the same piece of SQL might get tricky, > but that's easy enou

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2013-01-06 Thread Bill Speirs
In thinking about it more (I haven't started implementing anything yet), I don't see why we would want to drop support for positional parameters... we could easily handle both. (Both in the same piece of SQL might get tricky, but that's easy enough to detect and throw an exception.) As for how nam

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2013-01-05 Thread sebb
On 14 December 2012 01:12, William Speirs wrote: > Adding named params won't break things (actually I was thinking of adding > this to a 1.x release as well), but removing deprecated code will. Also, I > was thinking of switching to only supporting named params in the 2.x branch. Why drop support

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2012-12-13 Thread William Speirs
Adding named params won't break things (actually I was thinking of adding this to a 1.x release as well), but removing deprecated code will. Also, I was thinking of switching to only supporting named params in the 2.x branch. I guess the real question is, do folks think that forcing the use of nam

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2012-12-13 Thread Gary Gregory
We only need to change the coordinates if the package name changes to account for BC breakage. Gary On Dec 13, 2012, at 17:47, William Speirs wrote: > I just submitted > DBUTILS-105 to > add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking th

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2012-12-13 Thread sebb
On 13 December 2012 22:47, William Speirs wrote: > I just submitted > DBUTILS-105 to > add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped > that up with DBUTILS-95 > and DB

[DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

2012-12-13 Thread William Speirs
I just submitted DBUTILS-105 to add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped that up with DBUTILS-95 and DBUTILS-92