Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
YES you're absolutely right!!! :) Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 5/5/11 1:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: >> +1 >> >> I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the >> configuration

Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/5/11 1:13 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > +1 > > I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the > configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI > frameworks Or even Commons Digester which IIRC, this stuff preceded. Phil > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripo

Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Simone Tripodi
+1 I wonder if any developer has the need to use JOCL today, given the configuration super-power provided by modern IoC containers/DI frameworks http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 8:58 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bo

Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/5/11 10:26 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit : >> I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in >> current or >> recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. >> >> Any objections? > > Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml s

Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or > recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. > > Any objections? > Do it! :) Gary > > Mark > > > > ---

Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 05/05/2011 19:09, Mark Thomas a écrit : I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. Any objections? Never heard of JOCL, is this the xml serialization format that was introduced in Java 1.4 (with

Re: [DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/5/11 10:09 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or > recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. > Any objections? Not from me. Phil > Mark > > > > -

[DBCP2][Proposal] Drop JOCL support

2011-05-05 Thread Mark Thomas
I couldn't find much evidence (via Google) of JOCL being in current or recent usage therefore I'd like to drop it from DBCP 2.0.0 onwards. Any objections? Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For a