lling to look into this.
>>
>> Can you think of a better propertyname than
>> limitPreparedStatementPoolToConnectionUse? While the meaning is clear (at
>> least to me), it's also quite long.
>>
>> Robert
>>
>>
>> From: Phil Steitz
>> Sent: Dienstag, 30.
's also quite long.
>
> Robert
>
>
> From: Phil Steitz
> Sent: Dienstag, 30. Juni 2020 21:07
> To: dev@commons.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DBCP] poolPreparedStatements
>
>
> On 6/29/20 12:17 PM, Robert Paschek wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > DBCP
ce to
use.
Robert
From: Gary Gregory
Sent: Montag, 29. Juni 2020 23:37
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [DBCP] poolPreparedStatements
You can do this today by using two connection pools, one configured with
statement pooling, and the other not (which is the default).
Gary
On Mon, J
07
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DBCP] poolPreparedStatements
On 6/29/20 12:17 PM, Robert Paschek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> DBCP has a feature to pool PreparedStatements for the lifetime of a
> connection.
> This results in cursors being open and locks in the database
On 6/29/20 12:17 PM, Robert Paschek wrote:
Hello,
DBCP has a feature to pool PreparedStatements for the lifetime of a connection.
This results in cursors being open and locks in the database for a long time,
which could cause problems with administrative tasks in the database. That why
I wou
You can do this today by using two connection pools, one configured with
statement pooling, and the other not (which is the default).
Gary
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, 16:36 Robert Paschek
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> DBCP has a feature to pool PreparedStatements for the lifetime of a
> connection.
> This resu
Hello,
DBCP has a feature to pool PreparedStatements for the lifetime of a connection.
This results in cursors being open and locks in the database for a long time,
which could cause problems with administrative tasks in the database. That why
I would prefer this pool to be more short-living, th
