Re: [DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

2014-04-19 Thread Mark Thomas
On 19/04/2014 02:16, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 4/18/14, 5:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: >> Thought this might be of interest: >> >> http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html > > I wonder what version of DBCP they were using. Guess you have to > dig into the source to figure that out. Given the comparable

Re: [DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

2014-04-18 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Am Fri, 18 Apr 2014 18:16:26 -0700 schrieb Phil Steitz : > On 4/18/14, 5:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Thought this might be of interest: > > > > http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html > > I wonder what version of DBCP they were using. Guess you have to > dig into the source to figure that out.

Re: [DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

2014-04-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 4/18/14, 5:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > Thought this might be of interest: > > > > http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html > > I wonder what version of DBCP they were using. Guess you have to > dig into the source to figure that out. > Its

Re: [DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

2014-04-18 Thread Phil Steitz
On 4/18/14, 5:32 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Thought this might be of interest: > > http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html I wonder what version of DBCP they were using. Guess you have to dig into the source to figure that out. Phil > > Niall > -

[DBCP] Performance vs BoneCP

2014-04-18 Thread Niall Pemberton
Thought this might be of interest: http://jolbox.com/benchmarks.html Niall