On 11/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> > > It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and
> > > Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a
> > > standalone group?
> >
> >
> > That may be what we have to do
On 11/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and
> > Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a
> > standalone group?
>
>
> That may be what we have to do. It doesn't make sense, since there
> is a "buil
sebb wrote:
> It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and
> Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a
> standalone group?
That may be what we have to do. It doesn't make sense, since there
is a "build environment" object that should determine what happe
It is starting to look like Continuum cannot handle mixed Maven and
Ant groups, so perhaps it would be worth experimenting with a
standalone group?
Or perhaps work out how to use Maven to build with Java 1.4/1.5 (which
would be useful anyway) ;-)
I've tried recreating the failures using Hudson, b
On 07/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 06/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> sebb wrote:
> >> > On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> >> >> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> >> > sebb wrote:
> >> >> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that
> used J
sebb wrote:
> On 06/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote:
>> >> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> >> > sebb wrote:
>> >> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used
>> Java 5.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > The current build use
On 06/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> >> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> > sebb wrote:
> >> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used
> Java 5.
> >> > >
> >> > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does
sebb wrote:
> On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote:
>> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> > sebb wrote:
>> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java
>> 5.
>> > >
>> > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3
>> compatibility.
>> > >
>> > > I
On 05/01/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> > sebb wrote:
> > > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5.
> > >
> > > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3
> compatibility.
> > >
> > > I don't have Commons Admin
On 05/01/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5.
> >
> > The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 compatibility.
> >
> > I don't have Commons Admin on Continuum (and I'm not very familiar
> > with i
sebb wrote:
> It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5.
>
> The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 compatibility.
>
> I don't have Commons Admin on Continuum (and I'm not very familiar
> with it) so please could an Admin add it?
>
> Thanks!
>
I
It would be very useful to have a Continuum DBCP build that used Java 5.
The current build uses Java 6 only, so does not test JDBC3 compatibility.
I don't have Commons Admin on Continuum (and I'm not very familiar
with it) so please could an Admin add it?
Thanks!
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
