On 13 January 2014 11:08, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 23:10, sebb wrote:
>
>>> Removing the 1.4.x build should help too.
>>
>> If only.
>>
>> It's marginally better now, as the branch temporarily shows up as
>> Apache Commons DBCP 1.5-SNAPSHOT in the Group summary, but click on
>> the proje
On 12/01/2014 23:10, sebb wrote:
>> Removing the 1.4.x build should help too.
>
> If only.
>
> It's marginally better now, as the branch temporarily shows up as
> Apache Commons DBCP 1.5-SNAPSHOT in the Group summary, but click on
> the project and it all reverts to 1.4 and the old branch. I've
On 12 January 2014 15:49, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 03:06, sebb wrote:
>> I've been trying to add a Continuum build for the 1_5 branch, but it won't
>> take.
>
> Assuming 1.4.x and 1.3.x will be auto-generated from 1.5.x you should
> probably be replacing 1.4.x with 1.5.x
>
>> This may p
On 1/12/14, 9:46 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> I am curious why we have a 1.5 branch. Are there new features (not
>> just bug fixes) relative to 1.3/1.4 in there?
> JDBC 4.1 support.
>
>> Also, do you guys think it might be time to officially drop 1.3?
> No ob
On 12/01/2014 17:33, Phil Steitz wrote:
> I am curious why we have a 1.5 branch. Are there new features (not
> just bug fixes) relative to 1.3/1.4 in there?
JDBC 4.1 support.
> Also, do you guys think it might be time to officially drop 1.3?
No objection from me.
> Getting the the combined 1.3
I am curious why we have a 1.5 branch. Are there new features (not
just bug fixes) relative to 1.3/1.4 in there?
Also, do you guys think it might be time to officially drop 1.3?
Getting the the combined 1.3/1.4 release scripts to work in the new
regime is not something that I personally look for
On 12/01/2014 03:06, sebb wrote:
> I've been trying to add a Continuum build for the 1_5 branch, but it won't
> take.
Assuming 1.4.x and 1.3.x will be auto-generated from 1.5.x you should
probably be replacing 1.4.x with 1.5.x
> This may perhaps be due to the fact that the 1_4 branch also uses t
I've been trying to add a Continuum build for the 1_5 branch, but it won't take.
This may perhaps be due to the fact that the 1_4 branch also uses the
same version, i.e.
1.4.1-SNAPSHOT
Is this intended, or should the 1_5 branch be using a different version?
If the version could (should) be chan
