Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-07 Thread sebb
On 7 February 2012 12:44, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/07/2012 01:24 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> On 02/07/2012 12:59 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> On 7 February 2012 10:37, Mladen Turk wrote: I'll tag and prepare 1.0.9 RC later today. >>> >>> >>> Can you also do the Maven jars? >>> >> >> S

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-07 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/07/2012 01:24 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/07/2012 12:59 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 February 2012 10:37, Mladen Turk wrote: I'll tag and prepare 1.0.9 RC later today. Can you also do the Maven jars? Sure, but have no idea how to do that. nevermind. I RTFM :) Cheers -- ^TM --

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-07 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/07/2012 12:59 PM, sebb wrote: On 7 February 2012 10:37, Mladen Turk wrote: I'll tag and prepare 1.0.9 RC later today. Can you also do the Maven jars? Sure, but have no idea how to do that. Regards -- ^TM - To uns

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-07 Thread sebb
On 7 February 2012 10:37, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 09:10 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 17:45, Mladen Turk  wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hmm, right. I'll revert the patch. There should be no surprises >>> or new features with 1.0.x branch. >>> Think that --foo=a ++foo=b ++foo=c should be

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-07 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 09:10 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 17:45, Mladen Turk wrote: Hmm, right. I'll revert the patch. There should be no surprises or new features with 1.0.x branch. Think that --foo=a ++foo=b ++foo=c should behave like If there was foo set, set to a b c, not add a b c. Agreed;

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 17:45, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 05:16 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk    wrote: > > > > I don't, but since its there, so

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 05:16 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turkwrote: I don't, but since its there, so be it. OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current behaviour should b

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 16:05, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk  wrote: >>> >>> >>> I don't, but since its there, so be it. >>> >> >> OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current >> behaviour should be fixed and docu

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 05:02 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote: I don't, but since its there, so be it. OK, in that case what's needed is to decide whether the current behaviour should be fixed and documented or just documented. You mean with DAEMON-240? Resolved just ab

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 15:25, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 04:15 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 15:06, Mladen Turk  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote: > > > > Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time. > We don't have to wait for a release

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 04:15 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 15:06, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote: Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time. We don't have to wait for a release or something to update our web site. That particular JIRA could involve code chang

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 15:06, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote: >>> >>> >>> Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time. >>> We don't have to wait for a release or something to update our web site. >> >> >> That particular JIRA could involve code changes as well. >> Als

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 03:55 PM, sebb wrote: Sure, but the docs can always be updated at any time. We don't have to wait for a release or something to update our web site. That particular JIRA could involve code changes as well. Also, we include the site source in the archive. Right, this is probabl

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 14:43, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 12:48 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 6 February 2012 10:12, Mladen Turk  wrote: >>> >>> On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Is there anything else we should consider before doing that? >> >> >> I've just raised DAEMO

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 12:48 PM, sebb wrote: On 6 February 2012 10:12, Mladen Turk wrote: On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Is there anything else we should consider before doing that? I've just raised DAEMON-240; it would be good if the docs could be updated accordingly. Sure, but the

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread sebb
On 6 February 2012 10:12, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: >> >> >> Is there anything else we should consider before doing that? I've just raised DAEMON-240; it would be good if the docs could be updated accordingly. Also, is it possible to resolve DAEMON-234 easil

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
On 02/06/2012 09:30 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: Is there anything else we should consider before doing that? Please note that the sources are inside branches/1.0.x not trunk! (Just in case someone forgot that we are going to release 1.0.x versions from 1.0.x branch from now on) Regards -- ^TM -

Re: [DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mark Thomas
On 06/02/2012 08:30, Mladen Turk wrote: > Hi, > > There are few important bug fixes for 1.0.8 so I plan to push > for a 1.0.9 bugfix release later this week. Excellent. I'll hold off on a Tomcat 7.0.x release until this is available. Cheers, Mark ---

[DAEMON] T&R 1.0.9

2012-02-06 Thread Mladen Turk
Hi, There are few important bug fixes for 1.0.8 so I plan to push for a 1.0.9 bugfix release later this week. Is there anything else we should consider before doing that? sebb, you always have something to say at vote time, so here is the chance to do that before ;) Regards -- ^TM ---