Re: [DAEMON] Feedback on my improvements and new features

2017-02-13 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/02/17 17:44, Guillaume Ch wrote: Thank you for your quick response, The foundation doesn't have a vision for Daemon. The direction of the project is set from the ground up by the community using and developing the software rather than from the top down. Project direction is agreed by con

Re: [DAEMON] Feedback on my improvements and new features

2017-02-12 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: This components needs some attention indeed and I am glad it has some traction out there. I use it at work and for customers and I've not run into serious issues but I know there are some bug fix requests pending. For me, I would be more concerned with addressing the bug backlog than new

Re: [DAEMON] Feedback on my improvements and new features

2017-02-11 Thread Guillaume Ch
Thank you for your quick response, > The foundation doesn't have a vision for Daemon. The direction of the > project is set from the ground up by the community using and developing the > software rather than from the top down. Project direction is agreed by > consensus. > You are proposing a numb

Re: [DAEMON] Feedback on my improvements and new features

2017-02-11 Thread Mark Thomas
On 11/02/17 08:37, Guillaume Ch wrote: I would like to know if my contribution is compatible with the vision of the Apache foundation, and how it could be integrated in the future into the current Daemon project ? The foundation doesn't have a vision for Daemon. The direction of the project i

[DAEMON] Feedback on my improvements and new features

2017-02-11 Thread Guillaume Ch
Hello everyone, I would like to give you a feedback on my developments that I made on my GIT copy of the Apache Daemon project (see https://github.com/gchauvet/commons-daemon). My goal is to be able to provide a more homogeneous way of writing a Java service regardless of the host operating system