On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>
> > On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system properties
> > > that get set in addition to the url and additional
On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:08 AM, sebb wrote:
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system
properties
that get set in addition to the url and additional dependencies are
added.
For example, jackrabbit is required for the WebDAV test to run
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:03 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Can one also run the tests by adding
> >
> >
> -Dtest.webdav.uri=webdav://admin:ad...@192.168.10.133:7402/vfstest/test-data
> >
> > etc. to the command-line? That's perhaps simpler for one-off
On Mar 29, 2009, at 5:03 AM, sebb wrote:
Can one also run the tests by adding
-Dtest.webdav.uri=webdav://admin:ad...@192.168.10.133:7402/vfstest/
test-data
etc. to the command-line? That's perhaps simpler for one-off tests.
No, you have to use the profile. There are a couple of system
On 29/03/2009, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I need to document this. When you run all the tests
> TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder is skipped because it is really a functional
> test - it requires a WebDAV server to be available. To run the test you need
> to add something like
>
>
> webdav
>
One other thing. The conf directory needs to be copied to the WebDAV
server at the base uri.
Ralph
On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
I need to document this. When you run all the tests
TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder is skipped because it is really a
functional test - it r
I need to document this. When you run all the tests
TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder is skipped because it is really a
functional test - it requires a WebDAV server to be available. To run
the test you need to add something like
webdav
false
we
Oliver Heger schrieb:
Ralph Goers wrote:
I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try.
Ralph
Yes, the test is now successful. Thanks for the fix!
Oliver
When doing some further tests I noticed a strange behavior of
TestWebdavConfigurationBuilder: A mvn test works, but whe
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try.
>
> Ralph
Yes, the test is now successful. Thanks for the fix!
Oliver
>
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> Ralph Goers schrieb:
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>>
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try.
>
> Ralph
Yes, the test is now successful. Thanks for the fix!
Oliver
>
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>
>> Ralph Goers schrieb:
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
>>>
I fixed this. Please rebuild your VFS and give it another try.
Ralph
On Mar 25, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Ralph Goers schrieb:
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hey, this really looks interesting! Unfortunately, I am pretty
busy ATM and will need some time to gr
Thanks,
I've tried uploading to the "old" snapshot repo but kept getting a
401. Brian Fox set up the "new" repo so that commons could use it.
I've uploaded a snapshot to https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/
. I have updated the pom on my local machine to deploy there
Ralph Goers schrieb:
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hey, this really looks interesting! Unfortunately, I am pretty busy
ATM and will need some time to grasp the concepts.
However, I have now a build problem: Maven complains that it cannot
find the vfs snapshot jar (see be
On Mar 23, 2009, at 2:34 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hey, this really looks interesting! Unfortunately, I am pretty busy
ATM and will need some time to grasp the concepts.
However, I have now a build problem: Maven complains that it cannot
find the vfs snapshot jar (see below). Do we need to
Ralph Goers schrieb:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on
because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not
been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won'
On Mar 22, 2009, at 12:51 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on
because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not
been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any
problem wit
Ralph Goers schrieb:
I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on
because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not
been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any problem
with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking this code in
Hi Ralph,
Ralph Goers wrote:
> I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on
> because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not
> been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any
> problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checkin
I've been holding off on checking in the code I've been working on
because it introduces a compile time dependency on VFS, which has not
been released yet. However, I realized that Gump won't have any
problem with that. As a consequence I'm planning on checking this code
in as soon as I get
19 matches
Mail list logo
