Thank you for the explanation. It sounds like leaving it as is better.
Gary
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024, 2:25 AM Alex Herbert wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 21:47, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
>
> > Hi Clause, Albert, and all,
> >
> > Why not make Hasher more functional like so:
> >
> > public interface H
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 21:47, Gary D. Gregory wrote:
> Hi Clause, Albert, and all,
>
> Why not make Hasher more functional like so:
>
> public interface Hasher extends Function
>
> It would implement the standard `apply` instead of `indices`.
>
> WDYT?
>
> Gary
>
I do not see any problems with t
Hi Clause, Albert, and all,
Why not make Hasher more functional like so:
public interface Hasher extends Function
It would implement the standard `apply` instead of `indices`.
WDYT?
Gary
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
