On Jun 18, 2016 5:30 PM, "Stian Soiland-Reyes" wrote:
>
> +1 to rename crypto.utils it to .internal, and then we are somewhat free
to
> shrink it in 1.1.
>
> I see many things in there that could form a minimal Commons Native, e.g.
> to help with bundled native libraries and architecture detection
On 19 June 2016 at 01:30, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> +1 to rename crypto.utils it to .internal, and then we are somewhat free to
> shrink it in 1.1.
Also there are a couple of methods that are only called in one place
so should be moved to the calling class:
CRYPTO-83
CRYPTO-84
There may be o
+1 to rename crypto.utils it to .internal, and then we are somewhat free to
shrink it in 1.1.
I see many things in there that could form a minimal Commons Native, e.g.
to help with bundled native libraries and architecture detection. While
perhaps less people deal with JNI now than 10 years ago, s
Hi,
looking through the code I wonder what to do with the utils package. It
looks like the typical "don't know where to put this peace of code"-dumping
ground. I think we should at least mark the whole package as internal.
Further more we should change class names: Utils, IOUtils and
ReflectionUti
