Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-28 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
egory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] >Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:50 AM >To: Commons Developers List >Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA > >I like it. RERO! >As we plan to have release sooner, marking release ALPHA tagged make >sense IMO. > >Regards

RE: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-26 Thread Chen, Haifeng
has different ideas, please free feel to raise up. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:50 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA I like it. RERO! As we plan to have

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread Gary Gregory
elease an ALPHA version >on the understanding that the API may change incompatibly. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:03 AM >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switc

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread Gangumalla, Uma
HA version >on the understanding that the API may change incompatibly. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:03 AM >> To: Commons Developers List >> Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread sebb
l 26, 2016 12:03 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA > > Chen, Haifeng schrieb am Mo., 25. Apr. 2016 um > 08:38 Uhr: > >> >> Maybe its an option to replace JNI by JNA [1]. This would have IHMO >> several advant

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread sebb
On 26 April 2016 at 02:51, Chen, Haifeng wrote: >>> I am a RERO guy so that is fine with me... BUT... keep in mind that we need >>> to be BC within major releases. Now, me, I do not mind evolving the API >>> right away in a 2.0, but hey that's just me. > In the first release, we would need to th

RE: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread Chen, Haifeng
...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 12:03 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA Chen, Haifeng schrieb am Mo., 25. Apr. 2016 um 08:38 Uhr: > >> Maybe its an option to replace JNI by JNA [1]. This would have IHMO > several advantages like >

RE: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread Chen, Haifeng
the JNA experiment and not release it. Make sense. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 6:04 AM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Ch

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread Gary Gregory
riment and not release it. 2c, Gary > > Thanks, > Haifeng > > -Original Message- > From: Hendrik Dev [mailto:hendrikde...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 6:43 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA > > Hi, > > i just

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
to put JNA evaluation in the second release? Yes, why not. > > Thanks, > Haifeng > > -Original Message- > From: Hendrik Dev [mailto:hendrikde...@gmail.com] > Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 6:43 PM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to

RE: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-24 Thread Chen, Haifeng
ave the first release before May, there is a possibility to include it in Spark 2.0. Any idea to put JNA evaluation in the second release? Thanks, Haifeng -Original Message- From: Hendrik Dev [mailto:hendrikde...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 6:43 PM To: Commons Developers List

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-24 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 24/04/2016 11:29, Hendrik Dev a écrit : > I have no experience (regarding performance and stability) with BridJ > but it seems that the license per se could be an issue: > https://github.com/nativelibs4java/BridJ/blob/master/LICENSE Don't worry that's a BSD-3-Clause license, it's compatible wit

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-24 Thread Hendrik Dev
I have no experience (regarding performance and stability) with BridJ but it seems that the license per se could be an issue: https://github.com/nativelibs4java/BridJ/blob/master/LICENSE On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > There's also BridJ (https://github.com/nativelibs4j

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-23 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
There's also BridJ (https://github.com/nativelibs4java/BridJ), which claims to be very fast, supports C++ and COM, and JNAerator can autogenerate code for it from C/C++ headers. Java 9 will also have vastly enhanced access to native code (http://openjdk.java.net/projects/panama/). Damjan On Sat,

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-23 Thread sebb
On 23 April 2016 at 13:42, Gary Gregory wrote: > Could this be made pluggable? Then its easy to pick flexibility vs. speed. > I think Svn support in Eclipse lets you do this through Subclipse and > JavaHL. No point, except possibly in the (very) short term whilst the JNA implementation is being d

Re: [CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-23 Thread Gary Gregory
Could this be made pluggable? Then its easy to pick flexibility vs. speed. I think Svn support in Eclipse lets you do this through Subclipse and JavaHL. Gary On Apr 23, 2016 3:42 AM, "Hendrik Dev" wrote: > Hi, > > i just had a brief look into commons crypto today. > Maybe its an option to replac

[CRYPTO] Switch from JNI to JNA

2016-04-23 Thread Hendrik Dev
Hi, i just had a brief look into commons crypto today. Maybe its an option to replace JNI by JNA [1]. This would have IHMO several advantages like * No C code needs to be written, compiled, tested and maintained * Its easier compared to JNI (this could help attracting more people to contribute) *