On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:03 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 April 2011 11:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 21/04/2011 10:21, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
> >
> >> - @deprecated in the javadoc is for human readability, @Deprecated is
> >> for the compiler;
> >
> > The compiler is fine with the javadoc tag,
Le 21/04/2011 14:03, sebb a écrit :
Depends on the compiler target. If you target 1.5 or later, then
@Deprecated and @Override should be used.
That's your choice, there is no Java police that make these annotations
mandatory. The lack of comment associated with the @Deprecated
annotation mak
On 21 April 2011 11:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/04/2011 10:21, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>
>> - @deprecated in the javadoc is for human readability, @Deprecated is
>> for the compiler;
>
> The compiler is fine with the javadoc tag, and the annotation doesn't
> provide a useful comment to the
Le 21/04/2011 13:24, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
ok, looks like I cannot be very useful here :)
have a nice day, good job!
Actually you can ! I certainly didn't want to frustrate your
enthousiasm, but you have to understand that these kinds of changes
(along with javadoc tags, indentation, brace
ok, looks like I cannot be very useful here :)
have a nice day, good job!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/04/2011 10:21, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
>
>> - @deprecated in the javadoc is for human
Le 21/04/2011 10:21, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
- @deprecated in the javadoc is for human readability, @Deprecated is
for the compiler;
The compiler is fine with the javadoc tag, and the annotation doesn't
provide a useful comment to the user explaining why it's deprecated and
what to use in
Bonjour Emmanuel,
recently we had the same discussion about this kind of warnings on
[pool] and [discovery] and at the end of them I tend to agree that
that should be fixed because:
- @deprecated in the javadoc is for human readability, @Deprecated is
for the compiler;
- @Override: I suggest you
Le 21/04/2011 08:12, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
Bonjour Emmanuel!
don't worry, since I need to better understand CLI internal code, I
just would like to fix minor-minor warnings such Generics, missing
@Override/@Deprecated annotations, final fields where possible, etc
I don't intend modify the CLI
Bonjour Emmanuel!
don't worry, since I need to better understand CLI internal code, I
just would like to fix minor-minor warnings such Generics, missing
@Override/@Deprecated annotations, final fields where possible, etc
I don't intend modify the CLI code/behavior at all, once I'll feel
more famili
Le 20/04/2011 22:49, Simone Tripodi a écrit :
Hi all guys,
any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler warnings?
Thank you for helping, but please don't rush, CLI is a very subtle beast
that gets easily broken by an apparently innocent change.
Emmanuel Bourg
smi
Fire away I say.
G
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler
> warnings?
> Thanks in advance,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
Hi all guys,
any objection if I provide help on fixing checkstyle/findbugs/compiler warnings?
Thanks in advance,
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commo
12 matches
Mail list logo
