Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-07 Thread Paul King
Yes Jörg, I'll keep that in mind. Cheers,Paul. On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Paul King wrote: > > > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote > >> > >> I would appreciate feedback for the RC from the Groovy project. > >> > > > > Thanks for y

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-07 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Paul, Paul King wrote: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote >> >> I would appreciate feedback for the RC from the Groovy project. >> > > Thanks for your work on progressing the 1.3 release Benedikt. We have > built Groovy using the RC-1 candidate jar and the build and all

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-06 Thread Paul King
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote > > I would appreciate feedback for the RC from the Groovy project. > Thanks for your work on progressing the 1.3 release Benedikt. We have built Groovy using the RC-1 candidate jar and the build and all tests succeed. This is already a huge s

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-06 Thread Paul King
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote > > I would appreciate feedback for the RC from the Groovy project. > Thanks for your work on progressing the 1.3 release Benedikt. We have built Groovy using the RC-1 candidate jar and the build and all tests succeed. This is already a huge s

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jacopo, 2015-05-03 18:20 GMT+02:00 Jacopo Cappellato : > On May 3, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Sounds good to me. Go for it! > > I have attached a patch for one (but will resolve two) of the issues in > the list: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-179 > > I a

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On May 3, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Sounds good to me. Go for it! I have attached a patch for one (but will resolve two) of the issues in the list: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLI-179 I am not sure if it is the right direction but this is what I could do today, so

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2015-05-03 12:38 GMT+02:00 Jacopo Cappellato : > On May 3, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Hi Jacopo, > > > > I was expecting you! ;-) > > Hi Benedikt, > > I just saw your email after I have sent mine! But yeah, it seems we are on > the same page :-) > Thanks for the information:

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
On May 3, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi Jacopo, > > I was expecting you! ;-) Hi Benedikt, I just saw your email after I have sent mine! But yeah, it seems we are on the same page :-) Thanks for the information: I will review the list of pending items and if there is anything

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-03 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi Jacopo, I was expecting you! ;-) Here is the list of stuff that should be resolved [1]. I'm not sure about CLI-249 because I currently don't know how the API for that should look like. Note that Apache Commons Project has granted write access to all ASF committers a while back [2]. So if you l

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-05-03 Thread Jacopo Cappellato
Hi guys, any news on this? If there are pending tickets that are blocking the release I could try to help to resolve them. Thanks, Jacopo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-m

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2015-04-06 Thread Gary Gregory
Go for it! Gary On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello, > > I just wanted to let you know that I'm going to prepare CLI 1.3 soon. So is > there is anything you want to have included - now is your chance :-) > > Regards, > Benedikt > > -- > http://people.apache.org/~brit

[CLI] Release 1.3

2015-04-06 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, I just wanted to let you know that I'm going to prepare CLI 1.3 soon. So is there is anything you want to have included - now is your chance :-) Regards, Benedikt -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutprintln.de/ http://twitter.com/BenediktRitter http://github.com/bri

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2014-06-06 Thread Paul King
> > Le 07/02/2014 17:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > Is there any reason not to release 1.3? It would be nice to flush out the > > trunk fixes. I have to recheck the current state of the code. If I remember well the > new parser was ready, but I'm not sure it has really been tested on the > field.

Re: [CLI] Release 1.3

2014-02-07 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 07/02/2014 17:59, Gary Gregory a écrit : > Is there any reason not to release 1.3? It would be nice to flush out the > trunk fixes. I have to recheck the current state of the code. If I remember well the new parser was ready, but I'm not sure it has really been tested on the field. Emmanuel B

[CLI] Release 1.3

2014-02-07 Thread Gary Gregory
Hi All: Is there any reason not to release 1.3? It would be nice to flush out the trunk fixes. Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-04-30 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 30/04/2013 18:42, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 02/06/2013 03:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > > bump, as Emmanuel seems to be active again ;-) Uh oh, got caught :) I'll get a look at the latest changes. Emmanuel Bourg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-04-30 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/06/2013 03:48 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi, > > well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together > with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could be released > soon: > > * there are no open major issues (most issues are related to cli2) > * no findb

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-07 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Thomas! > looks like a new feature request to me and not a bug report. > > I would prefer to release 1.3 and then work on promoting cli2 to proper. I read the commit history and I think the component has matured enough, so it's time to cut an RC and let it be voted by the PMC. Thanks and cong

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-07 Thread Mairtin Keane
[cli] release 1.3? On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:32:06 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/06/2013 05:28 PM, Gilles wrote: >> On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:48:43 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up &g

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-06 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 17:32:06 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: On 02/06/2013 05:28 PM, Gilles wrote: On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:48:43 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Hi, well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-06 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/06/2013 05:28 PM, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:48:43 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi, >> >> well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together >> with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could be released >> soon: >> >> * there are no open maj

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-06 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 15:48:43 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Hi, well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could be released soon: * there are no open major issues (most issues are related to cli2) Well, th

Re: [cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-06 Thread Mairtin Keane
a 1GB file, an exception will be thrown after 2MB of data is read and the processing will then terminate? Thanks, Máirtín From: Thomas Neidhart To: Commons Developers List , Date: 06/02/2013 14:49 Subject:[cli] release 1.3? Hi, well, I did not work much on cli, but

[cli] release 1.3?

2013-02-06 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi, well, I did not work much on cli, but lately I have cleanup up together with sebb the trunk, and I think it is in a state that could be released soon: * there are no open major issues (most issues are related to cli2) * no findbugs & checkstyle warnings anymore * trunk contains lots of fix