Re: Fwd: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0

2007-08-23 Thread Wolfgang Roessler
Hi, I have been thinking about CLI a bit the last few days and here are my ideas: - Building the command-line with the builders works good, although creating all the different builders is a bit uncomfortable - I think the parsing and validation-step should be separated. We would need more

Re: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0

2007-08-16 Thread sebb
>echo "Property $j is good." >fi >done >done > } > On 8/15/07, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 15/08/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (DNS issues, trying again) > > > > &

Re: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0

2007-08-15 Thread Henri Yandell
TECTED]> wrote: > > (DNS issues, trying again) > > > > -- Forwarded message ------ > > From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Aug 15, 2007 6:56 AM > > Subject: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0 > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List ,

Re: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0

2007-08-15 Thread sebb
On 15/08/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (DNS issues, trying again) > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Aug 15, 2007 6:56 AM > Subject: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0 > To: Jakarta Commons D

Fwd: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0

2007-08-15 Thread Henri Yandell
(DNS issues, trying again) -- Forwarded message -- From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Aug 15, 2007 6:56 AM Subject: [CLI] Getting moving with 2.0 To: Jakarta Commons Developers List , Andrew Shirley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Two different angles I guess. First