Brian A. Egge wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> I agree that the framework should have better support for groups and mutually
> exclusive options. This is a feature I've often had to do in a pre or post
> processing step.
>
> I've thought about writing a CLI library which would accept a EBNF option
Hi Wolfgang,
I agree that the framework should have better support for groups and mutually
exclusive options. This is a feature I've often had to do in a pre or post
processing step.
I've thought about writing a CLI library which would accept a EBNF option
grammar, much like JavaCC or ANTLR
Hi Hen,
the Commons Validator package sounds interesting and I perhaps it should
be possible to use these validators. But I also like the CLI2 validators
for files and directories. The validators I am missing are something
like dependency-validators, e.g. specify mutually exclusive options.
G
Hi Wolfgang,
It's great that the bugfix release has driven some interest onto the
lists for improving the library. Validation sounds very useful - is it
something that you think Commons Validator would be useful for, or do
the use cases not quite match?
Brian and others... any thoughts?
CLI futu
