Le 13/07/2014 14:01, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> I do not think we should bother with Java 5.
>
> For me the discussion should be whether we require Java 6 or 7.
+1 for Java 7
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
I do not think we should bother with Java 5.
For me the discussion should be whether we require Java 6 or 7.
Gary
Original message From: Adrian Crum
Date:07/13/2014 05:27
(GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons CSV 1.0 based on
I would be inclined to leave Java 5 compatibility to the few (if any)
people who still use it. They have access to the CSV source code and
they can modify it to make it Java 5 compatible.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 7/13/2014 10:30 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2
2014-07-13 11:27 GMT+02:00 Adrian Crum :
> Why would we target Java 5? It is long past end-of-life.
Well I don't have a strong preference here. The reason people bring up for
targeting older Java versions is, to reach a broader user group. I'm fine
with targeting Java 7.
>
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sa
Why would we target Java 5? It is long past end-of-life.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 7/13/2014 10:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi all,
this vote it canceled to address the various issues identified. I'll need
some time to work through the list, so I expect the
Hi all,
this vote it canceled to address the various issues identified. I'll need
some time to work through the list, so I expect the next RC by mid of the
week (help is always welcome ;-).
Till then I'd like to hear comments regarding the Java version to target.
>From what I've seen it looks lik
