Niall Pemberton wrote:
IMO breaking compatibility with a *Beta* release is OK, but does
anyone have any objections to doing that?
+1
Breaking a Beta release is OK in my book
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
+1 from me. Go ahead and break it. :)
On 3/14/08, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
+1
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/14/08, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
--- Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How does removing the parameter solve the
> leaking?
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > I don
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Niall Pemberton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> I don't want to put you off, but I'm just in the process of writing up
>
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 3:20 AM, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
Hi Paul,
I don't want to put you off, but I'm just in the process of writing up
some stuff that I'll post on the JIRA ticket - which is probably the
best place to discuss
How does removing the parameter solve the leaking?
Paul
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've been looking at the memory leaks described in BEANUTILS-291[1]
> and am considering making API changes that will break compatibility
> with the BeanUtils 1.
I've been looking at the memory leaks described in BEANUTILS-291[1]
and am considering making API changes that will break compatibility
with the BeanUtils 1.8.0-BETA release to remove one of the issues. The
changes however are in new Converter implementations added after the
previous BeanUtils 1.7.
