On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:25 AM, sebb wrote:
> I think we are all agreed that it's not a problem that the classes no
> longer implement Serializable.
>
> I did a Clirr run with just the Serializable errors suppressed, and it
> now looks quite reasonable[1].
>
> I think it would make sense to rele
I think we are all agreed that it's not a problem that the classes no
longer implement Serializable.
I did a Clirr run with just the Serializable errors suppressed, and it
now looks quite reasonable[1].
I think it would make sense to release that as the Clirr report, and
make sure that the change
