Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-07 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am 07.06.2012 um 15:45 schrieb Luc Maisonobe: > Hi, > > Le 06/06/2012 18:27, James Carman a écrit : >> Agreed. I'm in OSGi-land these days (ServiceMix, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc.), >> so I'm all for it! :) >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> wrote: >> >>> No obje

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-07 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am 07.06.2012 um 15:46 schrieb Jörg Schaible: > As we see from Felix' patch, we can satisfy OSGi still for the latter reason > by declaring proper exports. In contrast to the patch I'd select a version > though that makes it totally clear that it is synthetic e.g. I'd take 1. > or 1.4.

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-07 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi, > > Le 06/06/2012 18:27, James Carman a écrit : > > Agreed. I'm in OSGi-land these days (ServiceMix, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc.), > > so I'm all for it! :) > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier < > grobme...@gmail.c

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-07 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Gary, Gary Gregory wrote: > Opening ... > > Should Commons adopt OSGi Semantic Versioning [1] instead of defining our > own [2] (even though they might in effect be the same)? > > Should Commons layer its semantic version details on top of OSGi? > > [1] http://www.osgi.org/wiki/uploads/Link

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-07 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi, Le 06/06/2012 18:27, James Carman a écrit : > Agreed. I'm in OSGi-land these days (ServiceMix, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc.), > so I'm all for it! :) > > > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > >> No objections here. >> If there is a spec we can follow, we should do it.

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-06 Thread James Carman
Agreed. I'm in OSGi-land these days (ServiceMix, Camel, ActiveMQ, etc.), so I'm all for it! :) On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > No objections here. > If there is a spec we can follow, we should do it. > In commons we build components - osgi is very natural for these

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-06 Thread Felix Meschberger
Hi, Am 06.06.2012 um 14:16 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Am 06.06.2012 um 14:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: >> >>> Opening ... >> >> ;-) BTW: Thanks alot ! This is appreciated. >> >>> >>> Should Commons adopt OSGi Semantic Versio

Re: [All] Versions and versions.

2012-06-06 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 06.06.2012 um 14:00 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > > Opening ... > > ;-) > > > > > Should Commons adopt OSGi Semantic Versioning [1] instead of defining our > > own [2] (even though they might in effect be the same)? > > From my cons