On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2014-12-31, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>
> >> Just as a "letter of intent" - I'd prefer to cut Compress 1.10 while
> >> we're still in svn (as I know how to do it, I'm in the "
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> Hello Christopher,
>
> Am Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:26:31 -0500
> schrieb Christopher :
>
> > On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:49 AM, sebb wrote:
> >
> > > On 31 December 2014 at 05:16, Bernd Eckenfels
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Joc
Hello Christopher,
Am Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:26:31 -0500
schrieb Christopher :
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:49 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 31 December 2014 at 05:16, Bernd Eckenfels
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git
> > > migration. It mig
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 5:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2014-12-31, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>
> >> Just as a "letter of intent" - I'd prefer to cut Compress 1.10 while
> >> we're still in svn (as I know how to do it, I'm in the "a
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:49 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 31 December 2014 at 05:16, Bernd Eckenfels
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git migration.
> > It might safe routine work for releases, but it seems to me also
> > underspecified in the context o
Am Wed, 31 Dec 2014 09:29:16 -0500
schrieb Gary Gregory :
> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Bernd Eckenfels
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git
> > migration. It might safe routine work for releases, but it seems to
> > me also underspecifi
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git migration.
> It might safe routine work for releases, but it seems to me also
> underspecified in the context of Apache Commons (with SVN and Git)
>
> [VFS] uses the r
On 31 December 2014 at 05:16, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git migration.
> It might safe routine work for releases, but it seems to me also
> underspecified in the context of Apache Commons (with SVN and Git)
>
> [VFS] uses the releas
On 2014-12-31, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Just as a "letter of intent" - I'd prefer to cut Compress 1.10 while
>> we're still in svn (as I know how to do it, I'm in the "avoid the
>> release plugin" camp) and call for a vote for moving to g
Hello,
Jochen asked about the release plugin in the context of Git migration.
It might safe routine work for releases, but it seems to me also
underspecified in the context of Apache Commons (with SVN and Git)
[VFS] uses the release plugin (at least the last release did). I
intent to do the next
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Just as a "letter of intent" - I'd prefer to cut Compress 1.10 while
> we're still in svn (as I know how to do it, I'm in the "avoid the
> release plugin" camp) and call for a vote for moving to git after that.
1.) And why don't you intend
2014-12-30 4:20 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:27 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 30 December 2014 at 01:07, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> 2014-12-29 14:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi All:
>
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 8:27 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 30 December 2014 at 01:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> >
> >> 2014-12-29 14:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> >> >
> >> > Hi All:
> >> >
> >> > There seems to be a constant background desire of
On 30 December 2014 at 01:07, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> 2014-12-29 14:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
>> >
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > There seems to be a constant background desire of moving this and that
>> > Commons component to Git. Moving all o
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-12-29 14:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> >
> > Hi All:
> >
> > There seems to be a constant background desire of moving this and that
> > Commons component to Git. Moving all of Commons to Git feels like too
> much
> > but I encourage G
Am Tue, 30 Dec 2014 01:26:46 +0100
schrieb Benedikt Ritter :
> How about making it a vote by lazy consensus?
I would start one for VFS (after the 2.1 release).
Gruss
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apach
2014-12-29 14:56 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> Hi All:
>
> There seems to be a constant background desire of moving this and that
> Commons component to Git. Moving all of Commons to Git feels like too much
> but I encourage Git 'pushers' (pun intended) to just bring up a VOTE for a
> component and
On 2014-12-29, Gary Gregory wrote:
> but I encourage Git 'pushers' (pun intended) to just bring up a VOTE for a
> component and move the process along if you care about Git.
Just as a "letter of intent" - I'd prefer to cut Compress 1.10 while
we're still in svn (as I know how to do it, I'm in the
Hi All:
There seems to be a constant background desire of moving this and that
Commons component to Git. Moving all of Commons to Git feels like too much
but I encourage Git 'pushers' (pun intended) to just bring up a VOTE for a
component and move the process along if you care about Git.
Gary
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
