On 30/04/2010, Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
> > The protections on many of the commons directories in the Apache
> > release repo look wrong to me.
> >
> > Rather than have group "commons", many of them have group "committers".
> >
> > Also, many of them don't have group write access (po
sebb wrote:
> The protections on many of the commons directories in the Apache
> release repo look wrong to me.
>
> Rather than have group "commons", many of them have group "committers".
>
> Also, many of them don't have group write access (possibly a good
> thing for the ones that have group co
+1
Niall
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:59 PM, sebb wrote:
> The protections on many of the commons directories in the Apache
> release repo look wrong to me.
>
> Rather than have group "commons", many of them have group "committers".
>
> Also, many of them don't have group write access (possibly a g
- "sebb" a écrit :
> The protections on many of the commons directories in the Apache
> release repo look wrong to me.
>
> Rather than have group "commons", many of them have group
> "committers".
>
> Also, many of them don't have group write access (possibly a good
> thing for the ones th
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> The protections on many of the commons directories in the Apache
> release repo look wrong to me.
>
> Rather than have group "commons", many of them have group "committers".
>
> Also, many of them don't have group write access (possibly a good
> thin
The protections on many of the commons directories in the Apache
release repo look wrong to me.
Rather than have group "commons", many of them have group "committers".
Also, many of them don't have group write access (possibly a good
thing for the ones that have group committers!).
Seems to me t
