I'm all for moving to the Attic instead of a Commons Attic. Phil's
email makes me think that we have very little that would be up for the
Attic; but we do have some candidates and I'd like to see us clearly
defining the dead from the dormant. Also to drive us to think about
telling the dead from th
This is all true, but I would suspect that while components in "proper" are
likely to follow this pattern, those in "dormant" have a high probability of
staying that way, although there are some good ideas there.
Ralph
On Apr 11, 2011, at 7:58 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/11/11 5:46 AM, Steph
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 4/11/11 5:46 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > My preference would be a standard labelling across commons (and later
> > perhaps other projects).
> >
> > This is a lot easier to do than moving projects about in a VCS,
> > changing JIRA, ma
On 4/11/11 5:46 AM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> My preference would be a standard labelling across commons (and later
> perhaps other projects).
>
> This is a lot easier to do than moving projects about in a VCS,
> changing JIRA, mailing lists etc. Plus it doesn't break any URLs.
>
> Simply have a
My preference would be a standard labelling across commons (and later
perhaps other projects).
This is a lot easier to do than moving projects about in a VCS,
changing JIRA, mailing lists etc. Plus it doesn't break any URLs.
Simply have a label (ie. an icon like the CC icons) that summarises
the
> I'm having a problem distinguishing "dormant" from "attic". Just because one
> had releases and the other didn't they should go to different places for
> their final resting place?
I also fear this leads to more confusion than it helps.
> I'm not clear why commons should have an attic (or do
I'm having a problem distinguishing "dormant" from "attic". Just because one
had releases and the other didn't they should go to different places for their
final resting place?
I'm not really clear on what happens to incubator projects that fail. I know
there is no "incubator dormant" or "in
On 4/10/11 10:12 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Currently we have 3 areas in which components live:
>
> * Proper: Released components.
> * Sandbox: Active pre-release components.
> * Dormant: Inactive pre-release components.
>
> There's an obvious (to me) need for Proper to split into active and
> inac
Henri,
I can't prevent it but I am not for it.
So here's my +0 for each of the proposals:
Le 11 avr. 2011 à 07:12, Henri Yandell a écrit :
> * Proposal #1: Create a Commons Attic.
+0
(attic is even better than "not actively maintained")
> So:
> * Proposal #2: Move Jelly to Commons Attic.
+0
Currently we have 3 areas in which components live:
* Proper: Released components.
* Sandbox: Active pre-release components.
* Dormant: Inactive pre-release components.
There's an obvious (to me) need for Proper to split into active and
inactive. Given the existing name, inactive proper = attic.
10 matches
Mail list logo
