On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:48, Mike Drob wrote:
>
> But often [VOTE] and [RESULT] are send with the same otherwise subject (and
> sometimes even [DISCUSS] before the vote, on other projects)
However in that case the merged conversations will at least relate to
the same component.
I have not persona
But often [VOTE] and [RESULT] are send with the same otherwise subject (and
sometimes even [DISCUSS] before the vote, on other projects)
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 11:43 AM sebb wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >
> > Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]?
>
> I doubt tha
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:25, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]?
I doubt that is necessary.
The GMail behaviour particularly affects the Workflow messages because
the same workflow names are re-used, so often the only differentiator
was the [component_repo]
e.g.
[GitH
Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]?
Gary
On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 10:53 AM sebb wrote:
> I discovered recently that GMail conversation mode ignores certain
> subject prefixes when deciding which emails are in the same thread.
>
> In particular, it ignores text in [brackets]; as these were used
I discovered recently that GMail conversation mode ignores certain
subject prefixes when deciding which emails are in the same thread.
In particular, it ignores text in [brackets]; as these were used to
enclose the repo name, this resulted in merging emails from different
components.
The email su
