2011/12/20 sebb :
> On 20 December 2011 00:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/20 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
On 20 December 2011 00:05, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/20 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
2011/12/20 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
On 19 December 2011 23:15, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> You
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>
> 1.7 WC is different, an
On 19 December 2011 22:47, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>>>
>>> 1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
>> I know but the mail subject says " buildNumbe
On 19 December 2011 20:55, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>>
>> 1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
> I know but the mail subject says " buildNumber plugin - svnjava does
> n
2011/12/19 sebb :
> On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>> Hello,
>> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
>
> 1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
I know but the mail subject says " buildNumber plugin - svnjava does
not work with SVN 1.6 WC format currently".
So that was my q
On 19 December 2011 15:43, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
1.7 WC is different, and not currently supported by SVNkit.
> 2011/12/19 sebb :
>> When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would
>> be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even
Hello,
You mean 1.6 or 1.7 WC ?
2011/12/19 sebb :
> When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would
> be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even if the user
> does not have a command-line svn client installed.
>
> However, since then, the SVN working copy format
When I added the buildNumber plugin to CP22, it seemed that it would
be best to use the "svnjava" provider, as that works even if the user
does not have a command-line svn client installed.
However, since then, the SVN working copy format has changed, and the
svnjava provider relies on SVNkit whic
12 matches
Mail list logo
