On 29/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 29/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> > On 26/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> > > On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> > > > > On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > > > >> I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for
On 29/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 26/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> > On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> > > > On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > > >> I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure.
>
>
> The initial
On 26/04/2010, sebb wrote:
> On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> > > On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> > >> I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure.
The initial suggestion was to use Nexus and regenerate the
On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> > On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> >> I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure.
> >>
> >
> > OK, will do, but Commons procedure might be different from the
> recommendation.
>
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure.
>>
>
> OK, will do, but Commons procedure might be different from the recommendation.
The central Maven repository is not maintained by Commons.
Phil Steitz wrote:
> sebb wrote:
>> The hash files generated for compress-1.0 contain the correct hashes,
>> unfortunately the format is non-standard and is not supported by Maven
>> or Ivy.
>>
>> I've made fixed versions of the original files.
>>
>> Is it OK to just replace the faulty versions
sebb wrote:
> The hash files generated for compress-1.0 contain the correct hashes,
> unfortunately the format is non-standard and is not supported by Maven
> or Ivy.
>
> I've made fixed versions of the original files.
>
> Is it OK to just replace the faulty versions in the maven2 repo on people?
On 26/04/2010, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure.
>
OK, will do, but Commons procedure might be different from the recommendation.
>
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> > The hash files generated for compress-1.0 contain the co
I'd query d...@maven.apache.org for the recommended procedure.
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> The hash files generated for compress-1.0 contain the correct hashes,
> unfortunately the format is non-standard and is not supported by Maven
> or Ivy.
>
> I've made fixed versions of t
The hash files generated for compress-1.0 contain the correct hashes,
unfortunately the format is non-standard and is not supported by Maven
or Ivy.
I've made fixed versions of the original files.
Is it OK to just replace the faulty versions in the maven2 repo on people?
And will these be replica
10 matches
Mail list logo