Re: [graph] renaming packages

2012-08-03 Thread squarcel
Hi there :-) > Hi Claudio! > > happy to read from you here :) > > I just noticed that the weight/primitives sub-package contains classes > which name convention refers to *Weight - WDYT renaming them to > *SumMonoid ? I am not convinced about this one. I've come to the conclusion that we should g

Re: [graph] renaming packages

2012-08-01 Thread squarcel
Hi Simone! Both changes sound good to me. You are more familiar than me with "builder" so I trust your word; and also "s/weight/math" sounds indeed more appropriate given the general purpose classes that it contains. Cheers Claudio > Hi all grap-ers, > > I am doing the n-th review on [graph] and

Re: Followup - [graph] Why the Vertex and Edge interfaces?

2012-03-11 Thread squarcel
Hi Simone, good job, thanks for experimenting! Looks generally ok to me. I will take some more time before giving thumbs up to merge it -- and not other fingers :P In the meantime it might be worth to share my naive idea for graph exporters here (I might implement it in the next days): we could

Re: [Graph] On graph weight type(s)

2011-12-23 Thread squarcel
ed >> >> >>> weights :) >> >> >>> I hope we all agree on this as a first step. Complexity comes >> after. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I'll take my time as well t