Re: [io] ant patterns ?

Cool, will try to find some time to provide a patch based on existing IO code 2010/4/27 Niall Pemberton > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:12 PM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > Hi > > > > is there any plan to support Ant-style patterns in commons-io > > FileUtils.list

[io] ant patterns ?

Hi is there any plan to support Ant-style patterns in commons-io FileUtils.listFiles() ? Ant patterns are simple and largely used to match files from various folders, it could be a nice addition. We could also get code from Ant itself Cheers, Nicolas

Re: [IO] Next version of IO - should this be 2.0?

Anyway, after troubles with ASM incompatibility between asm2 and asm3 releases I'd prefer to have a dedicated package name for a major API change. > > For such a change to be totally transparent we cannot rely on the > > relocation feature of Maven, which has been discussed before. We would > >

Re: [VOTE] Release DBCP 1.3/1.4

+0, didn't made advanced test but sounds good 2009/12/21 Phil Steitz > I have tried to address all of the feedback from the first release > candidate and would now like to propose the following artifacts for > release as DBCP 1.3 and 1.4. As previously discussed, the only > difference between t

Re: RESULT: [VOTE] Release math 2.0 (take two)

I also notice http://commons.apache.org/math/api-2.0/index.html is broken 2009/8/7 Jörg Schaible > luc.maison...@free.fr wrote at Freitag, 7. August 2009 11:09: > > > > > - "Jörg Schaible" a écrit : > > > >> Hi Phil, > >> > >> why are there still 20 issues in JIRA marked as resolved instead

Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY

I follow you on the phyliosphical point of view, but sory we expect this feature on maven for some years and don't see a solution before many months (years ?) Commons-logging historical succes don't make it reallu an "isolated" project 2009/5/19 Jochen Wiedmann > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:46 PM,

Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY

> > nicolas de loof wrote: > >> A library autor that MAY use cl-0.0 to remove commons-logging from >> dependency tree and use SLF4J will anyway have a dependency on >> cl-over-sfl4j >> that solves the ClassNotFoundException >> > > Good point but what

Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY

The "global exclusion" is rquested since ... some years (I can't exactly remember, but I've seen it in Jira for a while) and can't be fixed until the POM schema is changed - something that cannot occur before maven 3.x, so one or two years. (For info, the issue with POM format change is that it req

Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY

A library autor that MAY use cl-0.0 to remove commons-logging from dependency tree and use SLF4J will anyway have a dependency on cl-over-sfl4j that solves the ClassNotFoundException A library that uses slf4j would anyway only declare slf4japi as dependency and has no reason to force exclusion of c

Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY

I'd would agree with you if the proposal was to deploy a "99" version. The 0.0 version is safer whatever dependency strategy you choose : 0.0 will be considered < to any other version by any comparator-based version strategy. Maven "nearest" strategy (that is not the simple one to debug) will not

Re: commons-logging version 0.0.0-EMPTY

The POM should include SCM path, url to commons-logging site and licensing metadata Maybe you could also include the blog extract as description / comment. The description explains the jar is empty but not why it is there 2009/5/18 Ceki Gulcu > Hello all, > > I have created an empty Maven proje

Re: sanctioning commons-logging version "99.0-does-not-exist"

I'm +1 to have a 0.0 version in central under commons-logging groupId. - this can't break the LATEST rule - this will only apply if user explicitly declare this version as dependency (or dependencyManagement) - this don't break the existing commosn-logging user-base - this avoid introducing some th

update commons-(sandbox)-parent to use latest apache:apache parent ?

Hi, from version 5 the apache POM uses Nexus instance ( https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots) as snapshotRepository. Is there any plan to upgrade commons-*-parent POMs to apache:6 to use this infrastructure for SNAPSHOT deployment ? Cheers, Nicolas

Re: sanctioning commons-logging version "99.0-does-not-exist"

I myself use slf4j and this "99" hack Using en empty "commons-logging-0.0-null.jar" would NOT break the LATEST keyword resolution and could be forced from project (with provided scope) This would be a nice solution to globaly exclude xommons-logging without breaking existing builds Nicolas 200

Re: deploy to snapshot repo requires assembly ???

works fine @home, but not @workMaybe some $%! firewall... 2009/1/8 Rahul Akolkar > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:03 AM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > I just noticed the ci profile defines the exepected snapshot repository > > without the Release Candidate stuff. > > > >

Re: deploy to snapshot repo requires assembly ???

at 11:31 AM, nicolas de loof > wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to deploy a snapshot of monitoring to apache.snapshots : > > mvn clean -Prc deploy > > > > ... > > [INFO] [assembly:attached {execution: default}] > > [INFO] > > ---

deploy to snapshot repo requires assembly ???

Hi, I'm trying to deploy a snapshot of monitoring to apache.snapshots : mvn clean -Prc deploy ... [INFO] [assembly:attached {execution: default}] [INFO] [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] -

Re: [monitoring] ERMA - Extremely Reusable Monitoring API

Thanks for the link ! 2008/6/27 Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I just saw the following article on ERMA - Extremely Reusable Monitoring > API: > > http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/06/orbitz-opensource-erma > > Apache licensed and available here: > https://launchpad.net/erma/ > > Niall > >

Re: [monitoring / performance] ThreadMXBean.getCurrentThreadCpuTime()

That's an interesting point. I'll check this and make some benchs for monitoring. Thanks 2008/6/4 Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I read the following on Ortwin Glück's blog (via PlanetApache): > > "...do not use differences of the system timers ... With system timers > I mean System.curr

Re: [monitoring] Contributing TestMonitoringUI

FyI I just committed some basic JSP tags : - StartTag & StopTag to support use of StopWatches from JSP. - Some tags for creating forms to select what to display from repository in monitoring UI. 2008/5/5 sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/5/5 nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [monitoring] Contributing TestMonitoringUI

2008/5/5 Siegfried Goeschl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Nicolas, > > my colleague Susanne wrote a little test servlet (updating a timer over > the browser) to get the web integration working but we still have problems > to get a web report > > +) is it okay to contribute the test code (I would act as

Re: [Monitoring] manually test WebUI

egards, Susanne > > ---- Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:46:32 +0200 > > Von: "nicolas de loof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: "Commons Developers List" > > Betreff: Re: [Monitoring] manually test WebUI &g

Re: [Monitoring] manually test WebUI

something else, > but please don`t bother, I guess I`ll find out... > > Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:11:51 +0200 > > Von: "nicolas de loof" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > An: "Commons Developers List" >

Re: [Monitoring] manually test WebUI

onitoring/monitors gave me a 'HTTP > ERROR: 404'. This is the reason for my question. Maybe I missed something? > > I'd like to display the time a stopWatch runs. > > Susanne > > Original-Nachricht > > Datum: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 16:59:17 +0200 &g

Re: [Monitoring] manually test WebUI

requesting /monitoring/monitors will display all infos about registered monitors (with MonitoringServlet or WebUIServlet mapped to /monitoring/*) @see src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml as a sample What do you want to display ? To display some custom data, you may use JSP to select the exact data yo

Re: [Monitoring] What are the plan regarding web frontend for Commons Monitoring ....

7.pdf<http://people.apache.org/%7Esgoeschl/presentations/jamon-20070717.pdf>- > "Example - Performance Monitor") - you might need this stuff ... :-) > > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > > nicolas de loof wrote: > > > > > > >pl

Re: [Monitoring] What are the plan regarding web frontend for Commons Monitoring ....

The current code has a servlet to expose the monitored datas, based on request parameters : /monitoring/monitors --> all monitors in the repository, with all counters/gauges and all stats, using an output format detected based on request "Accept" HTTP header /monitoring/monitors?format=html -->

[monitoring] continuum HowTo ?

Hello, Can someone grant me access to Continuum to configure CI for monitoring ? I'm registered at continuum as 'nicolas' thanks, Nicolas.

Re: [monitoring] StopWatch interface needs to be added

I forgot it in my latest commit. Thanks. Nico. 2008/3/3, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Monitoring is currently broken - looks like the new redesigned > StopWatch as an interface hasn't been added. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=631142 > > Niall > > -

Re: Ant build script for source repackaging

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-24 Please attach your script, and I'll package and propose a for ASL2 ones. Nico. 2008/2/8, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Broken link ... http://people.apache.org/~carnold/commons_repackage_v2.xml > > 2008/2

Re: Ant build script for source repackaging

Broken link ... http://people.apache.org/~carnold/commons_repackage_v2.xml 2008/2/7, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > Thanks for this nice script ! > > > > Should I update the "candidate" folder with the generated jars an > > call for a > > vote ? > > > > Nico. > > The first version of t

Re: Ant build script for source repackaging

2008/2/7, Curt Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Observed differences: > > commons-betwixt-0.5: > commons-httpclient-3.1: > commons-jxpath-1.2: > These jars have LICENSE.txt, etc in the META-INF directory. Not that > that is a bad place to be, it just looks like these might have been > prepared ma

Re: LICENSE & NOTICE at project root ?

Tried to reproduce the issue and don't get it anymore Sorry for the noise. 2008/2/5, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 19:33 +, Niall Pemberton wrote: > > On Feb 5, 2008 7:26 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >

LICENSE & NOTICE at project root ?

Hello I've got a strange behavior of Eclipse when using maven to configure my environment. The .classpath includes the project root as a source folder to match the commons-parent-7.pom . This has the side effect that the "new class" wizard appends "src.main.java." to the extended class in imports

Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)

.0 is ASL 1.1, but the License file does not uses the ".txt" extension found in other source distributions. Fixed in the source.jar Nico. 2008/2/5, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Feb 5, 2008 10:30 AM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Acc

Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)

The issue is not to produce those source bundles, but to get them from project dependencies from public repositories. Most public artifacts on maven "central" have no such cource bundles, even recent ones when built with maven. see commons-httpclient 3.1 :-/ The issue discussed here is to repacka

Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)

TED]>: > > Maven could/should be changed to use -src.zip if -sources.jar is > missing ... seems to me that would be much less effort overall. > > S/// > On 05/02/2008, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Only -sources.jar are downloaded by maven and a

Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)

Only -sources.jar are downloaded by maven and added to IDE for source-debugging. Existing src-dists require users to manually do the unzip & jar I've done 2008/2/5, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > -1, for the following reasons: > > - these are new distributions and all new distributions must contai

Re: [VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)

Right, Nico. 2008/2/5, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I suggest we cancel/postpone the vote until we hear back from the board. > I've just sent the mail. > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

[VOTE] publish missing -sources.jar on maven central (was : apache commons-* -sources.jar)

According to previous discution, the maven -sources.jar bundles that haven't yet been deployed on maven "central" repository require a PMC vote. They are just a repackaging of the original -src.zip source distribution, and are NOT considered as a new release of the considered apache commons compon

Re: [monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

008/2/1, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Interesting to see so different results for same JRE on Windows and SunOs. > This demonstrates that such bench are never a final answer to java > performance questions ! > > Another such example is moksito test to compare sy

Re: apache commons-* -sources.jar

a src/java + src/resources + *.txt Nico. 2008/2/1, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 01.02.2008, at 21:09, nicolas de loof wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Many apache commons have no -source.jar bundle in maven "central" > > repo. I

Re: [monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

tem.currentTimeMillis took : 223041837ns > -bash-3.00$ java NanoTest > System.nanoTime took: 168053153ns > System.currentTimeMillis took : 204643068ns > -bash-3.00$ java NanoTest > System.nanoTime took: 169219738ns > System.currentTimeMillis took : 207292030ns > >

Re: [monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

meMillis took : 61866802ns -> currentTimeMillis is 20* quicker ! Nico. 2008/2/1, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > and without stupide copy/paste colorde formatting : > > > > public class CurrentTimeMillisVsNanoTime > { > > static int loops = 100; >

apache commons-* -sources.jar

Hello, Many apache commons have no -source.jar bundle in maven "central" repo. I've created some of them based on the official source distribution for my personnal use. Would you allow me use /x1/www/people.apache.org/repo/m1-ibiblio-rsync-repository/ for adding them, or do you prefer a more form

Re: [monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

) { t = System.currentTimeMillis(); } System.out.println( "System.currentTimeMillis took : " + ( System.nanoTime() - time ) + "ns" ); } } 2008/2/1, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I didn't commit from my office, but the bench looks

Re: [monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

; > Hi Nicolas, > > > > if I either find the test code (or you commit it) I can tell you on Mac > > OS X :-) > > > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > > nicolas de loof wrote: > > > on java < 5 backport-util-concurrent is required to provide

Re: [monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

ince you are using JRockit > +) and finally it depends how often you start/stop a monitor > +) retrotranslator will fail badly since System.nanotime() was > introduced with Java 1.5 > > Maybe the decision can be deferred until creating a monitor - the user > decides whether to u

[monitoring] timing precision : ms or ns ?

Hello, For commons-monitoring my first intent was to use System.nanotime() to compute code performances. A simple bench [1] demonstrates that System.currentTimeMillis is FAR quicker to return current time (on my windows box [2]) : nanoseconds precision may be usefull for profilers, but is it for

Re: [monitoring] jars in svn [was svn commit: r616742 - in /commons/sandbox/monitoring/trunk....]

I just removed them, and commented retrotranslator stuff. I'll wait for Retrotranslator 1.2.4 to be available on central to enable backport. 2008/1/30, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > This is a temporary fix to missing artifacts in maven repo. > I'm in discu

Re: [monitoring] jars in svn [was svn commit: r616742 - in /commons/sandbox/monitoring/trunk....]

This is a temporary fix to missing artifacts in maven repo. I'm in discusion with retrotranslator developer to get them in repo soon. I'm sorry to say I like java5 but still have to support java 1.3 even on new projects due to good old Websphere 5 servers used by my customers ... retrotranslator

Re: [PROPOSAL] monitoring

> > > +) what is the benfit of using JDK 1.5 and retrotranslate the code > > (sorry for my ignorance)? > > > > +) regarding JAMon - I asked the author to move JAMon to Apache but he > > politely refused - too much overhead > > > > Cheers, > > > > Siegfrie

Re: [PROPOSAL] monitoring

to Mosquito is broken > > +) what is the benfit of using JDK 1.5 and retrotranslate the code > (sorry for my ignorance)? > > +) regarding JAMon - I asked the author to move JAMon to Apache but he > politely refused - too much overhead > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > &

Re: [PROPOSAL] monitoring

monitoring an instrumentation toolkit. monitoring will have a tiny overlap with commons-math for statistic computation (arithmetic mean and standard deviation). 2008/1/24, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Thanks a lot for fixing this. I'll configure my svn.. > > comm

Re: [PROPOSAL] monitoring

/23, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jan 23, 2008 4:21 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm pleased to publish the initial PROPOSAL document for the monitoring > > component (sandbox) : > > > &g

[PROPOSAL] monitoring

Hello, I'm pleased to publish the initial PROPOSAL document for the monitoring component (sandbox) : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/sandbox/monitoring/trunk/PROPOSAL.html Some initial draft code has also been commited in SVN I've also initiated a design document at http://wiki.apache.o

Re: something wrong with SVN ?

fixed. the issue was on my side :-/ 2008/1/23, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hello, > > I'm trying to commit the initial code base for commons-monitoring > (sandbox) and get a 403 ... > is there something wrong with SVN today ? > > Nico. >

something wrong with SVN ?

Hello, I'm trying to commit the initial code base for commons-monitoring (sandbox) and get a 403 ... is there something wrong with SVN today ? Nico.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Commons IO 1.4 Released

This release has been made available on maven repo under groupId commons-io 1.3.2 was made available with new org.apache.commons groupId expected for commons components Is this a mistake ? Nico. 2008/1/22, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The Apache Commons team is pleased to announc

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

I've found the example proposal in the sandbox/project-template. I'll publish one soon. 2008/1/16, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 1/16/08, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm ok with the graduate rule. > > > >

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

> > > Could you please grant me access to the sandbox SVN ? > > Done. Thanks > > Is there some rule to follow for documentation, to best fit with other > > commons ? > > You'll know when you break them ;) > > Generally (new) components are using m2 for the build system and JDK > 1.5 dependent

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

t; wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2008 4:28 PM, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I just asked for an apache lab for a java monitoring component > > > ( > > > > http://labs.markmail.org/search/list:org.apache.la

Re: component suggest : commons-monitoring

The current jmonit code base is more an experiment, or a "proof of concept", than a stable codebase ready for incubation. My intention is to start a new component from scratch, taking benefict from this first attempt. That is the reason why I do not take incubator as first option. Nico. We have

component suggest : commons-monitoring

Hello, I just asked for an apache lab for a java monitoring component ( http://labs.markmail.org/search/list:org.apache.labs.labs#query:list%3Aorg.apache.labs.labs+page:1+mid:bkztzg2rmceuopvq+state:results ) One year ago I've created a sourceforge project (www.jmonit.org) with same idea in mind,

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

I attached a new pacth to IO-77. It implements Holger Hoffstättesuggestion to use NIO for file copy - when a java 1.4 runtime is available - and relies on buffers on java 1.3. Nico. 2008/1/9, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >

Re: [IO] Planning IO 1.4 release

I've just attached a new patch for IO-77 with a testcase I'm also added a "moveDirectory" method (with testcase) as suggested in comments. Please review .. and include in 1.4 release ! 2008/1/7, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > It would be great if the release contains the OSGi meta inf

Re: Support for OSGi

I also got some troubles when (quick) testing the felix bundle-plugin : I have configured the maven-jar-plugin to set some custom MANIFEST entries (in my case, the SVN revision number as Build-Revision). When using the felix plugin, my MANIFEST is replaced by OSGi one, not merged. But maybe I miss

Re: Support for OSGi

Could such support be added using maven-osgi ? (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/shared/trunk/maven-osgi/) I've never used it myself, but from what I've read on osgi, the bundle meta-datas could be created based on the POM (for modules depdendencies, version, etc..) Just the public API needs

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-logging 1.1.1 (take 4)

+1 2007/11/22, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi > > This is the fourth attempt to release commons-logging 1.1.1. > > Changes since the last go: > - The manifests now has the correct X-Compile-Target-JDK in them > - The manifests no longer mention Jakarta > - [LOGGING-118] Generate sourc

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.5 based on RC3

+1 2007/11/15, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Oliver Heger wrote: > > > Here is the 3rd (and hopefully last) attempt for the release vote for > > Commons Configuration 1.5. > > > > The artifacts of the release candidate can be found at > > http://people.apache.org/~oheger/commons-configura

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.5 based on RC2

+1 2007/11/10, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > After some comments and suggestions for improvements a new release > candidate for the 1.5 release of Commons Configuration has been created. > > The artifacts can be found at > http://people.apache.org/~oheger/commons-configuration-1.5rc2/ > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Configuration 1.5 based on RC1

About dependencies in the POM : servletapi has been relocated to javax.servlet : servlet-api This one should also be set as provided, as it is provided by the servlet engine. Not sure if this is the same case for javax.mail:mail. In an application-server context this one is provided, but not in a

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 21/09/2007, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Copying ant code requires many classes to be duplicated ( > > Execute, Os, CommandLauncher and it's implementations, Process, > > ExecuteStreamHandler, ExecuteWatchdog

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

addidn an optional dependency. I also notice dependencies on commons-jxpath and commons-codec should be optional in the POM. Nico. 2007/9/20, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'll look at this and attach a patch to Jira. > thanks. > > 2007/9/20, Oliver Heger &l

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

I'll look at this and attach a patch to Jira. thanks. 2007/9/20, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > nicolas de loof wrote: > > Could you please tell me what would be better : > > > > - copy/paste code from ANT to avoid a new dependency just for some methods

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

Could you please tell me what would be better : - copy/paste code from ANT to avoid a new dependency just for some methods - use the ant code as a new (optional) dependency Nico. 2007/9/20, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Your right, I was reading javadoc to fast > >

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

Your right, I was reading javadoc to fast 2007/9/19, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 19/09/2007, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Looking at > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Execute.java?view

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

My idea was simply to copy/paste code from the ant Property class. AFAIK this one has been largely tested and works on many (if not all ?) platforms. Nico. 2007/9/19, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > nicolas de loof wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Did anyone allready

Re: [configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

at all ! This method also has been "un deprecated" on Java 5 and can be used on such a runtime. We can invoke it if System.getProprty("java.version") returns > 1.5. Nico. 2007/9/19, nicolas de loof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My idea was simply to copy/paste code from th

[configuration] accessing emvironment variable (not java system)

Hello, Did anyone allready ask for support in commons-configuration to acces environement variables, the same way it is available with ant ? I'll need it and can contribute for this. Nico. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT