Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3

yes, that would be perfect! (agreed it would have to go to maven) thanks so much for taking the suggestion into consideration! -ian On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Emmanuel Bourg-3 [via Apache Commons] < ml-node+s680414n4673398...@n4.nabble.com> wrote: > Le 03/03/2015 00:03, Gary Gregory a écr

Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3

Perhaps we could at least get a milestone release (i.e. pre-RC)? I'd like to see if I can submit a branch to jibx where I get them to use the latest bcel code. jibx won't work with Java 8 because we're waiting on a bcel release. It's hard to work on making jibx compatible with Java 8 as long as we

Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3

s all very well if: > > - the API is stable; or > > - frequent changes of package name/Maven coords are acceptable to > > consumers; or > > - one does not care about binary compatibilty > > > > IMO it's unhelpful to keep pushing the RERO mantra in isolatio

Re: [VOTE] Release BCEL 6.0 based on RC3

+1 no one has really answered ben's question yet. if bcel 209 is committed could we cut a release? it seems like everyone is okay with the general approach taken there my company also is mandating all projects move to java 8 this month since jav