Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8.0 based on RC1

+1 if my vote still counts On Sat, Aug 5, 2023 at 4:29 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > Could I get more PMC reviews please? > > Gary > > On Tue, Aug 1, 2023, 8:40 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > > We have fixed a few bugs and added some enhancements since Apache > > Commons DbUtils 1.7 was released, so I w

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

Sorry, meant to say: +1 On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:34 PM Carl Hall wrote: > Thanks, Bill. Looking for 2 more positive votes to proceed. :) I'd like > to hear from Gary given his concerns on this thread. > > > > On Jan 22, 2020, at 6:00 AM, William Speirs wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

to be the > successive version. Once we’re happy with that, create a 1.x brach from > master, bring 2.0 to master, and see if we can get a 2.0 release out before > 2 more years. :) > > > On Jan 11, 2020, at 10:29 AM, William Speirs wrote: > > > > What is there to "clean up&

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

get _something_ out the door. > > > > > > Also, I _think_ I had to create 2_0 as the branch name, because svn (at > > the > > > time) wouldn't let me use a dot... but I _might_ be mis-remembering. > > > > > > Bill- > > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DbUtils 1.8 based on RC2

For what it's worth, I'm unable to find that branch in git: $ git clone https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-dbutils.git --branch commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 Cloning into 'commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2'... fatal: Remote branch commons-dbutils-1.8-RC2 not found in upstream orig

Re: [dbutils] 2_0 branch discussion

Gary, I appreciate the sentiment of not wanting to make a major change, but if you look at the commit history and the emails from 2013 you'll realize this last commit is actually fairly small. The only reason this wasn't done in 2013 was that the release process didn't seem to want to work for me,

Re: [dbutils] 2_0 branch discussion

I just merged the code from my fork ( https://github.com/wspeirs/sop4j-dbutils/) into the commons-dbutils 2_0 branch ( https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-dbutils.git;a=commit;h=180c0990b1f0da4d0039904b68cc6b57f00558e5 ). The code builds, and all the tests pass... that's as far as I went

Re: Proposal to Release

That 2.0 release attempt was mine... Feel free to blow it away, and proceed with your release as 2.0. However, most of my changes in there should be working. The changes add named parameter support, and a fluent API to the library. The only reason it wasn't released was because I couldn't figure o

Re: [VOTE][LAZY] Migrate Apache Commons DbUtils to git

+1!!! On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Amey Jadiye wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017, 4:33 AM Carl Hall wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I’d like to call a vote by lazy consensus for migrating the code base of > > Apache Commons DbUtils to git. > > > > This vote is successful if nobody raises objec

Re: [dbutils] Adding fluent api

commons-dbutils already has a fluent API: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/commons/proper/dbutils/branches/2_0/ Someone just needs to put the finishing touches on it, and/or use my fork of commons-dbutils: https://github.com/wspeirs/sop4j-dbutils Bill- On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Ole Ersoy wro

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Proxy 2.0 based on RC1

+1 non-binding vote... Bill- On Apr 7, 2014 1:50 PM, "Matt Benson" wrote: > I would like to release Commons Proxy 2.0. > > Commons Proxy 2.0 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/proxy/ (svn revision > 4960) > > Maven artifacts are here: > > h

Re: [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 1.6 based on RC1

This vote has failed to pass and is now closed. Bill- On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 9:25 PM, William Speirs wrote: > >> I would like to release commons-dbutils 1.6 >> >> commons-dbutils 1.6 RC1 is available

Re: svn commit: r1489347 - /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/pom.xml

well, that'd be huge. All: Are the steps that Gary outlined what most everyone does to cut a release? Is there a better way? Thanks... Bill- On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > > > Hi Bill,

Re: svn commit: r1489347 - /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/pom.xml

gt; > On 4 June 2013 11:56, William Speirs wrote: > > Is there documentation about this somewhere? What should I have done? > > > > Thanks... > > > > Bill- > > On Jun 4, 2013 5:02 AM, wrote: > > > >> Author: sebb > >> Date: Tue Jun

Re: svn commit: r1489347 - /commons/proper/dbutils/trunk/pom.xml

Is there documentation about this somewhere? What should I have done? Thanks... Bill- On Jun 4, 2013 5:02 AM, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Tue Jun 4 09:02:02 2013 > New Revision: 1489347 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489347 > Log: > Only tags should use non-SNAPSHOT versions please > > Mod

[VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 1.6 based on RC1

I would like to release commons-dbutils 1.6 commons-dbutils 1.6 RC1 is available for review here: http://people.apache.org/~wspeirs/commons-dbutils-1.6-RC1/ (svn revision r1489259) Details of changes since 1.5 are in the release notes: http://people.apache.org/~wspeirs/commons-dbutils-1.6-RC1/REL

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > The advantage is an API that is cleaner and easier to understand. > I changed the methods to be package private. > As for the name, what about "SmartBeanProcessor" or > "ImprovedBeanProcessor" (much like the ImprovedNamingStrategy in >

Re: [DBUTILS] Generic ArrayHandler (was: Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0)

Happy to change it back... I'll have another look tomorrow AM after some coffee :-) Bill- On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 14/05/2013 01:21, sebb a écrit : > > > Not sure I follow - it was William Spiers who changed the class to > generic. > > I suggested this chang

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

> You mean QueryExecutor, right? Now it's in line with UpdateExecutor and > InsertExecutor, but I feel a bit uncomfortable with theses classes as > they mostly expose protected methods and don't look like they are meant > to be extended. > Yes, I did mean QueryExecutor... sorry. I make my methods

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

it were me, I'd keep it simple and do 1.6, then 2.0, from trunk. ;) > > Not simple if there is any need to maintain the two incompatible versions. > > > Gary > > > > > > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 8:13 AM, William Speirs > wrote: > > > >> It is and

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

g 1.6 it should all "work." Bill- On May 11, 2013 8:09 AM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > On Sat, May 11, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Speirs > wrote: > > > OK, so then for the 2.0 release I'd just remove the 1.6 lines? > > > > No. Based on changes.xml, It

Re: [DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

OK, so then for the 2.0 release I'd just remove the 1.6 lines? Bill- On May 10, 2013 5:37 PM, "Gary Gregory" wrote: > The date can be the date you cut the RC. > > Gary > > On May 10, 2013, at 16:23, William Speirs wrote: > > > Consider this a pre release

[DBUTILS] Pre RC for DBUTILS-2.0

Consider this a pre release candidate for DBUTILS-2.0. I fixed the following things from RC1: - Removed @author tags - Changed QueryRunner to be public - Made ArrayHandler generic (but it's ugly because I just cast to T[], does anyone have a better idea here?) If folks (*cough* Benedikt Ritter, *

Re: [DBUTILS] [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 2.0 based on RC1

Yes... my apologies for not officially stating so in the e-mail list. This vote as failed. Bill- On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Dan Tran wrote: > is this vote dead? > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:18 AM, William Speirs > wrote: > > > OK... I don't need my

Re: [DBUTILS] [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 2.0 based on RC1

OK... I don't need my abacus to count votes and see that this failed. I'll work on the things folks mentioned and try for another release this weekend. Thanks again for all of the help/feedback! Bill- On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2013-03-18, W

Re: [DBUTILS] [VOTE] Release commons-dbutils 2.0 based on RC1

On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 5:34 PM, sebb wrote: >> Maven artifacts are here: >> http://people.apache.org/~wspeirs/commons-dbutils-2.0-RC1/maven > > Maven artifacts must be uploaded to Nexus. How do I do this? I was following the directions here: http://commons.apache.org/releases/release.html which

[DBUTILS] Working on a DBUtils 2.0 Release Candidate

As the subject implies, I'm trying to get a release candidate ready for DBUtils 2.0. I haven't heard any feedback from the community on my changes, so I'm going to assume everyone loves them ;-) A few issues I'm running into: 1) Clirr is trying to compare my 2.0 release with version 1.5. How do I

[CLI] OptionGroup Broken?

I'm trying to use OptionGroup to mutually exclude arguments, and it seems to be broken. I've setup --ip-address & --hostname as options in a single group, then provide both on the "command line" and would expect the parser to throw an AlreadySelectedException, but it doesn't... it happily parses bo

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

> > If the entire API is to change, then I agree one might as well treat > it as a completerly new library and change groupId/package name. > Users could either stick with the current design or rewrite to use the > new design. > I guess the question is, are you in favor of changing a great deal of

Re: [DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

the coordinates if the package name changes to > account for BC breakage. > > Gary > > On Dec 13, 2012, at 17:47, William Speirs wrote: > > > I just submitted > > DBUTILS-105<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBUTILS-105> to > > add support for named par

[DBUTILS] Updates for v2.0

I just submitted DBUTILS-105 to add support for named params to DB Utils. I'm thinking that if we wrapped that up with DBUTILS-95 and DBUTILS-92

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons-DbUtils 1.5 based on RC2

+1 Bill- On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Simo, > > Can you please list the changes between rc1 and rc2? > > Gary > > On Jul 17, 2012, at 8:09, Simone Tripodi wrote: > > > Hi all guys, > > > > I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache > > commons-dbutils-1.5

Re: [all] Java 5 vs. 6

+1 for targeting Java 6 on new releases... Bill- On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 10/02/2012 14:41, Ralph Goers wrote: > > In many cases the differences between Java 5 and 6 aren't noticeable. > > If the project doesn't require anything from Java 6, why require it? > >

Re: [DBUTILS] Few unit tests for BeanProcessor; none for SQLXML support

For what it's worth, I am +1 here as well (I was the one who implemented the changed the required Java 1.6). Thanks... Bill- On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > I am very much +1 what Hen and Simone said. Again. > > As a volunteer I am here for making some cool stuff,

Re: [DBUTILS] 1.5 RC1 Missing Site

the best, > -Simo > > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi > http://www.99soft.org/ > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:20 PM, William Speirs wrote: >> I have cut RC1 of DBUTILS, but the

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

Gary, I have no clue what a "infra Jira" is... Thanks! Bill- On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Dec 15, 2011, at 4:42, sebb wrote: > >> On 15 December 2011 03:32, William Speirs wrote: >>> Anyone have any idea on this? Should I be seeing

[DBUTILS] 1.5 RC1 Missing Site

I have cut RC1 of DBUTILS, but there the site does not appear to have been uploaded per the vote template I found here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases Site: http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC1/site/index.html Any help would be greatly appreciated... Bill- --

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

Anyone have any idea on this? Should I be seeing basic auth for my challenge? Where can I set the password as I was never prompted to enter it. At this point, can someone else deploy RC1 while I figure out what is wrong on my end? Thanks... Bill- On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 4:32 PM, William Speirs

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

e, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:28 AM, sebb wrote: > On 13 December 2011 15:19, William Speirs wrote: >> I will try adding the additional elements: >> >> /path/to/secring.gpg >> >> gpg2 > > Sorry, should have clarified - the above requires gpg2 to be installed > an

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

the CLI when > Maven asks for it. > > Gary > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:20 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 13 December 2011 13:53, William Speirs wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: >> >> Did you do the whole master p

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Did you do the whole master pass phrase/obfuscated stuff that the top > of the Using Nexus wiki points to? I did not do this at first, but I have since tried. I setup my settings-security.xml file as show on the wiki page, and added the encr

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

is that for some reason when I run gpg (from the command line) it pops up a dialog box which asks for my password. I think this is some sort of GPG agent. Could that be getting in the way? Again, any help would be greatly appreciated... Bill- On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:41 PM, William Speirs wrot

Re: [dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

Windows, sorry I cannot > recall the dets. > > But, I follow these steps for the releases I manage: > > http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus > > Gary > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:19 PM, William Speirs wrote: > >> I am attempting to release RC1 of commons-db

[dbutils] sign-artifacts hangs during release:prepare

I am attempting to release RC1 of commons-dbutils. I was working through the directions found here: http://wiki.apache.org/commons/CreatingReleases I got to step C.1 and ran the following command: mvn -Prc release:prepare That command however froze part of the way through. The output is at the end

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

Looks like it worked! [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL [INFO] [INFO] Total time: 25 seconds [INFO] Finished at: Mon Dec 12 01:33:42 UTC 2011 Bill- On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:44 PM, sebb wrote: > On 12 December 2011 00:37, Bill Speir

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

on my system. Thanks... Bill- On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:57 PM, sebb wrote: > On 8 December 2011 18:59, William Speirs wrote: >> Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are >> all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but >> without an

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

Looks like myself, Gary Gregory, Henri Yandell, and Simone Tripodi are all +1 on requiring Java 1.6. Sebb is a dissenting opinion, but without an "official" -1. When I get a chance, I'm going to change the pom to require Java 1.6 and make a note in the changes.xml file as well. If that builds with

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

December 2011 18:11, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 12:04 PM, William Speirs wrote: >> >>> I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is >>> that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires >>> import

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

> And make sure the key has been uploaded to a public key server. > > > Mark > >>Hen > >> > >>On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:20 PM, William Speirs > >>wrote: > >>> One potential issue though, I have not created an Apache PGP

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

I took a look at the Continuum build error from Nov 26th and the error is that adding getSQLXML() in BeanProcessor.java requires importing java.sql.SQLXML which was introduced in Java 1.6. Currently DBUTILS is set to only require Java 1.5. Thoughts? Bill- On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Simone

Re: [dbutils] Releasing 1.5

I haven't forgotten about this... been tied up at work with a new employee. One potential issue though, I have not created an Apache PGP key yet, so I will not have a chance to get it signed by anyone. What is the protocol for getting one's key signed? Thanks... Bill- On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4: