e?
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> I fixed the HTTP failure by disabling the "welcome" page in welcome.conf (I
> don't know if this is standard Apache configuration or something peculiar to
> CentOS). All of the HTTP tests are now passing with m
ved Permanently" leads me to think something isn't right on your
> server. According to RFC 2616 vfs should not automatically redirect on a 301
> status code. What do you see in the Apache logs?
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
>
>
I'm trying to run the HTTP and Webdav testcases without any of my changes in
order to verify my test environment. I'm running on CentOS 5.3 with the
built-in Apache 2.2 server. I believe I've followed the instructions
properly, but I'm getting two errors. I'm going to give up for now and try
again
Setting MAVEN_OPTS=-Xmx512m did the trick. Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Siegfried Goeschl <
siegfried.goes...@it20one.at> wrote:
> Hi Vince,
>
> when you check your mvn script there is a 'MAVEN_OPTS' environment
> variable - here you can increase your memory settings for M2 by setting
Got it. I'll start working on this tomorrow. Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:39 PM, ralph.goers @dslextreme.com <
ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> And after you run mvn site they should show up in target/site/testing.html.
>
>
ass that the functional
> tests that require external servers also pass - if you do a mvn site:stage
> you will see the documentation on how to do that.
>
> VFS-245 is opened against AbstractFileName and probably needs to be dealt
> with in the context of what you are doing.
>
>
&g
fied. Do I
understand this properly? Thanks.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
> I'm investigating creating a memcached-based FilesCache implementation for
> use with Google App Engine. The basic obstacle is that this requires that
> all objects that are used a
I've added a patch file with a proposed fix to VFS-245.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
>
> VFS-245 is opened against AbstractFileName and probably needs to be dealt
> with in the context of what you are doing.
>
>
I'm investigating creating a memcached-based FilesCache implementation for
use with Google App Engine. The basic obstacle is that this requires that
all objects that are used as keys or values must be serializable. Before I
go too far down this path, I'd like to know if this is a reasonable thing t
2009, at 2:55 PM, Vince Bonfanti wrote:
>
> The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available:
>>
>> http://gaevfs.appspot.com/
>>
>> GaeVFS is a plug-in for Apache Commons VFS that implements a virtual file
>> system on top of the Google App Engin
There are two reasons for this:
1. GAE does not set the "os.arch" or "os.version" system properties.
When Commons VFS initializes, it tries to do this (OS.java line 36), which
throws NullPointerExceptions:
* private* *static* *final* String *OS_ARCH* = System.*getProperty*(
"os.arch").toLow
The first public release (0.1) of GaeVFS is now available:
http://gaevfs.appspot.com/
GaeVFS is a plug-in for Apache Commons VFS that implements a virtual file
system on top of the Google App Engine for Java (GAE) datastore. It provides
a writeable file system for GAE, since GAE does not allo
My code will always run within a servlet, so I can close() the filesystem
when the servlet is destroyed. In this case, I should be OK using
LRUFilesCache?
Thanks,
Vince
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > 1. Is the LRUFilesCache safe for production use? GAE/J wo
I'm working on a Google App Engine/Java (GAE/J) plug-in for VFS (it's almost
done) and have a few questions:
1. Is the LRUFilesCache safe for production use? GAE/J won't allow using
the default SoftRefFilesCache because it doesn't allow background threads.
I've found a few really old messages say
14 matches
Mail list logo
