Re: Support for OSGi

2008-02-01 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 01/02/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2008 1:19 PM, Oberhuber, Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Niall / Stuart, > > > > thanks for your answers. It looks like the usage patterns > > of OSGi in the Apache and Eclipse communities are just > > a bit diffe

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 31/01/2008, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > These isn't much OSGi knowledge here in commons - we're doing this at > the request of the Apache Felix project so that they don't have to > re-package our artifacts for OSGi. So I'm hoping that someone from > Felix will pick up your sec

Re: Support for OSGi

2008-01-31 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 31/01/2008, Oberhuber, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Niall, > > it would be interesting for Eclipse consumers as > well to get Apache bundles with Meta-info already > applied. > > Currently, the Meta-info is mostly added manually > as part of the Eclipse Orbit project. > > I have h

Re: Support for OSGi

2007-12-19 Thread Stuart McCulloch
On 20/12/2007, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We have a mixed bag of build systems here at commons. Until recently > we were pretty much maven1, with the odd ant/maven1 mixture. A few > components have m2 builds that have been used in anger and recently we > added m2 builds for all