Re: [collections] 4.0 plan and [functor]

------------ * <http://www.orionhealth.com>* *Stephen Kestle Software Engineer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P: +64 9 638 0619 M: +64 27 453 7853 F: +64 9 638 0699 S: skestle www.orionhealth.com <http://www.orionhealth.com>

Re: Collections and Lang branches for 1.5 features

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What about Collections? Yeah - at the moment Stephen Colebourne and I are the only comitters. He's busy working on a JSR and some other stuff, and I've had some medical setbacks in the family that mean young children have been handed around somewhat. It's looking

Re: Commons Collections & Java 5

p://www.orionhealth.com>* *Stephen Kestle Software Engineer* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> P: +64 9 638 0619 M: +64 27 453 7853 F: +64 9 638 0699 S: skestle www.orionhealth.com <http://www.orionhealth.com> This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the p

Edit: Re: svn commit: r593964 - in /commons/proper/collections/branches/collections_jdk5_branch/src: java/org/apache/commons/collections/CollectionUtils.java test/org/apache/commons/collections/TestCo

Good patch - seems I need to update my compiler warnings a bit. Nice to get to 100% - one thing that interested me about that was testing the extension of CollectionUtils. People - please see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-276. And while CollectionUtils is updated for generic

Re: svn commit: r593964 - in /commons/proper/collections/branches/collections_jdk5_branch/src: java/org/apache/commons/collections/CollectionUtils.java test/org/apache/commons/collections/TestCollecti

// assume our implementation is correct if it returns the same order as the Java function +Collections.reverse(collectionA); +assertEquals(collectionA, Arrays.asList(a)); +} + /** * Records the next object returned for a mock iterator -- ---

(COLLECTIONS-245) Genericise CollectionUtils / COLLECTIONS-275 and Jira Permissions

IONS-245: -------- I know Stephen Kestle is doing some work on the CollectionUtils. Are these patches more complete? Would it help if I downloaded them, applied them, and then reuploaded a patch file? Genericise CollectionUtils and ListUtils. -

Re: [COLLECTIONS] status of 1.5 branch

But can't the library be first moved to a point where one can say the new releases will run only on 1.5+ JVM, and then gradually/slowly/carefully re-work/generify the internals as necessary ? So at least this won't constrain any new development effort from using all the goodies in 1.5+, and yet

Re: [COLLECTIONS] status of 1.5 branch

TED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -------- * <http://www.orionhealth.com>*

Re: Class I would like to commit to commons Collections

it seems more descriptive of what you're doing. If it were toMap, I wouldn't expect the input map to be there at all. The transformer type parameters would give you enough type safety and you could just instantiate a HashMap or something to return it. On 9/2/07, Stephen Kestle &l

Re: Class I would like to commit to commons Collections

econd signature only has as there is no value transformer, so the input collection is the type of value. Cheers Stephen James Carman wrote: What is "Map" here? The Map interface only has two type parameters, right? Shouldn't it just be Map? On 8/29/07, *Stephen Kestle * <[EM

Re: Class I would like to commit to commons Collections

. Kind regards, John Hunsley. Technical Supervisor, Cy-nap Ltd. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Orion Signature