Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc2

2016-05-17 Thread Sean Busbey
Yes, that's correct. I'm now +1 (non-binding) -- Sean Busbey On May 16, 2016 13:44, "Josh Elser" wrote: > Sean, > > Circling back around on the discussions today about Jackrabbit's NOTICE > file, this would change your -1 vote, yes? > > Sean Bu

Re: [VFS] NOTICE required for Jackrabbit's JcrUtils? (was: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc2)

2016-05-16 Thread Sean Busbey
On 2016-05-16 08:29, Josh Elser wrote: > +cc busbey (in case he misses this discuss, otherwise) > > Does this make sense to you? I'm sure you have a better understanding > than I do at the fringes of licensing @ the ASF :) > > tl;dr Those copied files from jackrabbit were added after the cod

Re: [VOTE] Apache Commons VFS 2.1 rc2

2016-05-12 Thread Sean Busbey
-1 (non-binding) bad: * LICENSE/NOTICE file is missing a bundled third party reference[1] maybe fine: * source artifacts mostly match source tag[2] * build / test from source works[3] fine: * verified signatures and checksums[4] [1]: core/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/provider/webda