Re: [commons-bsf] Question(s)

ng to >> move all components to Java 8, which is the oldest Java LTS release. >> >> Remember that no one will force an app onto a new version, it's up to the >> app. >> >> It's not clear to me if we have even interest for a BSF release. It looks >>

[commons-bsf] Question(s)

Just noticed that there was some activity on GitHub related to BSF (e.g. (updating to JUnit 4.13.1), (dependabot), and the like), but I cannot find any discussions about it in dev@commons or in user@commo

Re: Apache Commons Configuration & Bean Scripting Framework (BSF) - dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

Hi Rory, just ran "jdeps -jdkinternals" on both, BSF 2.4.0 and BSF 3.1, both have no internal dependencies. Best regards, ---rony On 15.06.2015 14:19, Rony G. Flatscher (Apache) wrote: > On 15.06.2015 10:04, Rory O'Donnell wrote: >> Hi Benedict, >> >&g

Re: Apache Commons Configuration & Bean Scripting Framework (BSF) - dependencies on JDK-Internal APIs

On 15.06.2015 10:04, Rory O'Donnell wrote: > > Hi Benedict, > > I'm contacting you in relation to Apache Commons Configuration & Bean > Scripting Framework (BSF), > both projects seems to be very popular dependencies for other open source > projects. > > As part of the preparations for JDK 9,

Re: [bsf]

On 13.06.2012 19:19, sebb wrote: > On 13 June 2012 17:01, Joseph Kesselman wrote: >> Just a quick note/quibble re BSF's history: >> >> I, Joe Kesselman (the same IBMer who contributed some code to Xerces and >> quite a lot to Xalan) did a lot of the early prototyping work on BSF. The >> concept a