Has commons net 3.3 been released ?

Hi all, Looking at the commons net release notes: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-net/changes-report.html I see that release 3.3 is TBA, but looking at the downloads page: http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-net/download_net.cgi I see a commons net 3.3 download. Since I'm not

RE: [NET] 3.2 ready?

NET-466 has been fixed (thanks!), so could a release be cut ? Commons Net 3.1 is unusable for us due to NET-466. I've seen an offer for providing a patch to NET-481; just contacted the submitter. Thanks, Martin -- Martin Oberhuber, SMTS / Product Architect - Development Tools, Wind River direc

RE: [NET] SFTP vs. FTPS

Hi Steve, sftp is a sub-specification of the SSH protocol (you'll surely find the RFC or just http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSH_file_transfer_protocol As for a Java library, Eclipse has been using http://www.jcraft.com/jsch/ for years in order to provide the SSH channel for CVS, and since 3 ye

RE: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review

> Also, the binary jar contains an examples/ directory, but it contains > only the class files. > > Surely it should contain the source files instead? I'm not sure about best practices used in Apache Commons, but it seems odd to me that examples code is even found in the binary jar. Shouldn't th

RE: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review

> has anybody ever tried > > javac -target 1.4 -bootclasspath ${JAVA14_HOME}/lib/rt.jar > > on commons net 2.0? I just did a quick check, and it looks like this question was silly (sorry). Apparently, using java -target 1.4 also requires java -source 1.4 which would fail due to all the Generic

RE: [net] 2.0 Release Ready For Review

Hi Rory, thanks for taking the time putting this together. I just notice that in the changes list, some entries seem to be broken off unexpectedly: "SSLServerSocketFactory. Thanks " //Thanks WHOM? "updated MVSFTPEntryParser from " //from WHERE? Perhaps some XML escaping is missing here?

RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

wrote: > > Niklas Gustavsson wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> The backward compatibility question you mention was about the >

RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

Thanks Niklas. The backward compatibility question you mention was about the suggestion to refactor the Commons Net "small protocol" implementations into separate packages each: > Basically there's no problem to deliver a > commons-net-2.0-legacy.jar that contains something along > > package o

RE: Compress vs. VFS

VFS, > but i don't mind if that happened. > See: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-106 > > Best, > Chris > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Oberhuber, Martin < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello Samuel, Mario and others, > > > > if

RE: Compress vs. VFS

Hello Samuel, Mario and others, if just interested in accessing ZIP files, have you had a look at TrueZip: https://truezip.dev.java.net/ It might make sense to provide a TrueZip wrapper for Commons VFS eventually. How do the Commons Compress folk compare to TrueZip? Cheers, -- Martin Oberhube

RE: RShell:All ports in use or insufficient permssion.

Hi, it is a restriction by design of rlogin / rsh that the client port must be in the "restricted ports" area < 1024, which only the root user may open. I assume the reason for this is, that through the rsh protocol, if user x has set up a .rhosts file for his account, then user y could "spoof"

RE: [g...@vmgump]: Project commons-net (in module apache-commons) failed

Hi all, Is anybody addressing this Gump Nag message for commons-net already: > -ERROR- Bad Dependency. Project: xml-apis : unknown to > *this* workspace I cannot understand how or why commons-net would even reference xml-apis? Cheers, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wi

RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 07:55 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases > > Hi Martin, > > Oberhuber, Martin wrote: > > Hi Rory,

RE: [vfs] vfs2 or plain wrapper mode

Hi Mario, Just wondering, how would a client of VFS enumerate Just the folders in a directory e.g. in order to Render a tree of files? He needs to know here what items are folders and What items are files (which gets more difficulte When symbolic links with file-flavor or folder-flavor Are involv

RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

om: Rory Winston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Mittwoch, 21. Mai 2008 00:57 > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases > > Can I just add, it's a major release (1.5 -> 2.0). > > > Rory Winston wrote: > > This is totally irr

RE: [NET] Tabs and spaces

Is there any guideline on tabs vs spaces in Commons? Given that due to the Copyright Text Change we have A diff on each and every file already, now might be A good time to do such a global cleanup, in order To simplify diffs / patches in upcoming bugfix Releases, and cross-porting patches betwee

RE: Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

re has been some time for people > to use 1.5 in > >>> earnest. > >>> > >>> Are there any JIRA issues which still need to be fixed for 1.5? > >>> > >>> > >>> On 17/05/2008, Rory Winston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>

Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0 Releases

Hi all, just wondering, what's currently holding off a release of Commons Net 1.5 / 2.0? Many issues have been sorted out after the last release candidates, when can we expect a new RC to review? Is there anything particular that I could help with? Cheers, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member o

RE: GSoC application

Just in case you folks have not noticed... Google has some swag (T-shirts and the like) for those Students who have not been accepted but decide to do Their project anyways. I just read this on IRC but I'm not sure what the process Is for receiving the swag. Cheers, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior M

RE: Releasing Commons Net 1.5

> > I have a patch available for adding file permission support > > to the VMSEntryParser, in case anybody is interested -- > > it's not critical, though. > > Perhaps create a JIRA enhancement and attach it? Done, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-214 Cheers, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior

Releasing Commons Net 1.5

Hi Rory et al, I've been looking at the fixes that have been applied to the Commons Net 1.5 branch recently, and they all look good to me. Attached is a patch to fix the changelog for 1.5. I have a patch available for adding file permission support to the VMSEntryParser, in case anybody is i

RE: Commons net - any ftp servers supporting COMPRESSED_TRANSFER_MODE?

This must be nonstandard. I could not find any reference to "TYPE C" or "TYPE Z" in the RFCs, or other references linked from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Transfer_Protocol What products support "TYPE Z" ? Cheers, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River Target Man

RE: [NET] 1.5 Leap year processing

r http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Samstag, 15. März 2008 02:34 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [NET] 1.5 Leap year processing > > On 14/03/2008, Oberhuber, Martin > <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [NET] 1.5 Leap year processing

Hi Sebb, > Regex is not available in Java 1.3. > Also, how does one know where the year is in the string? Code for this already is in Commons Net, using ORO for the Regex. See UnixFTPEntryParser.java line 105 > 2.2 If previous year also gives a parse error then give up? Hm... Well, well. The po

RE: [NET] 1.5 Leap year processing

What about this: 1.) Use REGEX to parse year into a separate String -> will be empty or 2.) If year is empty, substitute current year (as seen on client) and parse the date 2.1 If a parse error occurs, OR result date is > 3 days in the future, try again with previous year (in order to

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5

ease Commons Net 1.5 > > The functional tests seem to be broken right now, due to the remote > server being unavailable. These don't get run by default > anyways, so I > think we should just leave this for now, unless someone can suggest a > different server. > > Ro

RE: [NET] fixing short date parsing problems (was: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5)

Hi all, regarding FTP parser date +-6 month problem: Having a look at http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3659.txt?number=3659 section 3 it seems that there is a standardization effort in place to finally get time values right for FTP (proposed standard "MDTM" command. So this is what we'll want to have i

RE: [NET] fixing short date parsing problems (was: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5)

> Seems to me it would be a lot better if the FTPFile entry was still > generated, but with a null date. I agree. In the past, commons net ftp has always been using strict parsing, with the result that some files might have been missed. We have also seen this on Solaris with certain devices which

Commons Net 1.5.0: Fixes to consider for backporting

Hi Rory, I did a quick browse through JIRA issues fixed for commons.net 2.0 but not commons.net 1.5 - and after filtering out those that appear to be related to the 2.0 branch only, or impossible to fix in 1.5 due to JDK-1.4 or later dependencies, I came up with the following list. Do you think

Commons Net 1.5: Updated Changelog

Hi Rory, based on my observations of diff'ing commons.net 1.5.0-candidate against 1.4.1, I dived into SVN Changelogs and came up with what I think should be an accurate changelog. Please consider adding this into xdoc/changes.xml. I've added JIRA references for the issues fixed, wherever I found

NET-73 not included in commons-net 1.5.0 candidate

Hi Rory, I just found out that the patch for NET-73 has not been included in the commons net 1.5.0 candidate. We've been using this patch since about a year now and we think it's critical for commons.net FTP reliability since it fixes a potential deadlock. Please consider applying this patch f

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5

If TFTPServer is for testing only, shouldn't it reside in the tests/ source root? Having a TFTPServer would be cool though, but I have no idea what level of quality it is. Cheers, -- Martin Oberhuber, Senior Member of Technical Staff, Wind River Target Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member ht

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5

http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > -Original Message- > From: Oberhuber, Martin > Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 12:57 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; 'Rory Winston' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5

Management Project Lead, DSDP PMC Member http://www.eclipse.org/dsdp/tm > -Original Message- > From: Oberhuber, Martin > Sent: Montag, 03. März 2008 11:50 > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5 > > Hi Ror

RE: [VOTE] Release Commons Net 1.5

Hi Rory, it's great to hear some progress is being made towards a new commons.net release!!! For the 1.5 release candidate, I notice that the binary JAR now has the examples classes embedded whereas the 1.4 release did not. Also, some Maven POM stuff is in META-INF. Is this intentional? jar tfv

RE: Commons Net 1.4.x Service Release?

rts, but unfortunately not much manpower > > available to fix them. I was hoping to have a release out > long before > > now, but unfortunately this has not been the case. If I > can find another > > interested party to assist with a release, then we can > potent

FW: Support for OSGi

FYI: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Watson Sent: Dienstag, 05. Februar 2008 19:52 To: Orbit Developer discussion Subject: Re: [orbit-dev] FW: Support for OSGi The thread at http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/orbit-dev/msg

RE: Support for OSGi

ECTED] On Behalf > Of Stuart McCulloch > Sent: Donnerstag, 31. Jänner 2008 16:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Orbit Developer discussion > Subject: Re: Support for OSGi > > On 31/01/2008, Oberhuber, Martin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

RE: Support for OSGi

Hello Niall, it would be interesting for Eclipse consumers as well to get Apache bundles with Meta-info already applied. Currently, the Meta-info is mostly added manually as part of the Eclipse Orbit project. I have had a brief look at your auto-generated MANIFEST for commons net, and found a fe

RE: Commons Net 1.4.x Service Release?

e you sure that these bug fixes you list > below fix the > errors you are seeing? Have you verified with a suitable > source build or > nightly? > > Cheers > Rory > > > Oberhuber, Martin wrote: > > Dear Commons Community, > > > > For our Eclips

RE: Commons Net 1.4.x Service Release?

Hello Rory, thanks for the pointer. Looks like the biggest changes in commons net 2.0 are - Require Java 1.5 - Use java.util.regex instead of ORO - Use JDK SocketFactory - Use Maven2 for building - Support FTPS These are interesting, but unfortunately we cannot require Java 1.5 for our curre

RE: Commons Net 1.4.x Service Release?

PS is there any document that explains the new features in Commons Net 2.0 ? Thanks martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Commons Net 1.4.x Service Release?

e bug fixes you list below fix the errors you are seeing? Have you verified with a suitable source build or nightly? Cheers Rory Oberhuber, Martin wrote: > Dear Commons Community, > > For our Eclipse project DSDP-TM (for an URL, see my signature below), > we're picking up Commons

Commons Net 1.4.x Service Release?

Dear Commons Community, For our Eclipse project DSDP-TM (for an URL, see my signature below), we're picking up Commons Net 1.4.1 in order to provide remote FTP access. This is being used in a number of places, including transparent management of remote web servers. We've recently come across a