I don't know the discussion, so the only thing I can say right now, is
that I don't like the names ... Or I just don't understand why it is
called XXXSource, which in my thoughts refers to the resource the
configuration is read from.
How about Configuration for the interface and something like
Bas
True, on the other hand, just for my curiosity:
1. shouldn't the javaCC project be notified through some bug report ?
2. shouldn't there be an apache commons bug report which purpose is to
keep track of the bug reported against the JavaCC project ?
Just wondering ...
Regards,
Michiel
On 5/2/08,
On 12/13/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 13.12.2007, at 14:38, Michiel Kalkman wrote:
>
> > +1/-1
> >
> > I am all for using jdk 1.5, but I guess it will take some time before
> > I can use this jdk at work. Is it possible and easy t
+1/-1
I am all for using jdk 1.5, but I guess it will take some time before
I can use this jdk at work. Is it possible and easy to generate an 1.4
compatible binary version from 1.5 sources ? If so, I'd say go for it.
Just some additional thoughts (maybe they should be in another thread):
- when
Also, do you want to keep the old link to Avalon ? (just nipicking)
On 11/1/07, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 1.5 release of Commons Configuration is overdue.
>
> I have prepared a first release candidate. All artifacts including a
> clirr report and the release notes can be found
Just a minor, minor remark: the links in the changes don't seem to
work. E.g.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ViewIssue.jspa?key=CONFIGURATION-168.
Should be http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-168.
Regards,
Michiel
On 11/1/07, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 1.
Maybe Continuum should be running headless, as other projects might
also try to use awt code in the future.
Michiel
On 8/29/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Oliver Heger wrote on Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:32 PM:
>
> > Henri Yandell wrote:
> >> We can change CI to use
To me, it seems we should at least be able to run the tests first,
outside of any continuous build systems.
Here's what I had to do to get them running with Maven2 under
jdk1.6.0_02. Maybe this helps ?
1) Get the Commons Parent project using subversion from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons
