and behavioural
changes such as this were documented in the release notes.
If these behavioural changes are documented some place, then I can
talk to the consumers of commons-codec in Fedora and make sure they
are doing the Right Thing and submit patches upstream where necessary.
Thanks,
Mat
--
e necessary jars almost always is.
Note that I'm not opposed to a consolidated commons distribution, it's
just that you should understand why size does matter for some
applications.
--
Mat Booth
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
e necessary jars almost always is.
Note that I'm not opposed to a consolidated commons distribution, it's
just that you should understand why size does matter for some
applications.
--
Mat Booth
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
nd document the possibility to generate that file. We can still
> configure the plugin to generate a build.xml that is as close as possible
> to build at least the jar - but we have no responsibility for it anymore.
>
> - Jörg
>
Heh, turns out my request to make the ant build better w
On 27/07/2009, sebb wrote:
> On 27/07/2009, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 27/07/2009, sebb wrote:
> > > I had a quick look at this. It would be trivial to copy the OSGI
> > > headers as generated by the Maven build, but autogenerating the
> > > headers (so
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:47 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:11 AM
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2
&
ntime environment had to be 1.4.
Should I raise a bug so that this can be addressed at a later date?
--
Mat Booth
A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation.
Q: Why shouldn't you do it?
A: Posting your reply above the original message.
Q: What is top-posting?
---
> -Original Message-
> From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:niall.pember...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2009 11:11 AM
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Codec 1.4 based on RC2
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Mat Booth wrote:
> >
>
>
>
> yours,
>
> Julius
>
I for one would appreciate OSGI information in the Ant generated jar,
if it's not too much trouble to make the jars consistent no matter how
you generate them.
Thanks.
--
Mat Booth
A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation.
Q:
