which is nkt really solved with sub-pools
either.
Gruss
Bernd
PS: i think this part of the discussion is better done on the user mailing list
--
http://bernd.eckenfels.net
-Original Message-
From: Krishnakumar Parasuram
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Do., 28 Jan. 2016 16:27
Subject
Hi Jochen,
Thanks for your message. The difference between to two separate pools is that
in our framework we don't know exactly how many no of separate pool we might
require, it is not two, but can scale more than 10, 20 in production
environment and I think to have so many pools and that t
and cannot be implemented while design as we do not know these value of these
parameters at design time.
Please let me know if this answers your question else let know
Regards
Krishnakumar
-Original Message-
From: Krishnakumar Parasuram
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2016 8:28 PM
To: Phil S
8, 2016 7:10 PM
To: Krishnakumar Parasuram
Subject: Re: FW: Maintain sub pools within Commons pool - is it possible
Hi Krishnakumar,
I just moderated through and responded to this message on
dev@commons.apache.org.
Please subscribe to the list so that you can see the responses and so that your
Hi
We are using Apache commons pool 2.2 for pooling connection object to connect
between our REST framework to Siebel Server.
Everything works fine for what I have implemented. But I want to enhance this
framework. The existing implementation maintains the connection object for a
part
