Hi,
> +) I assume that this implies that you have junit on your path already?
> +) please not that I have to get a hold on the junit.jar in
> "test-distribution-prepare"
> +) maybe we need a variable to pick the junit library from?
I think the main point of the patch is that just because you don'
Hi,
The current ant build file for this relies on having previously used
mvn to build the project
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 727000)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -45,7 +45,6 @@
-
Hi,
> Well, I started devving for MS before migrating to Linux and OS X, so I do
> retain some of those practices.
Fair enough, and it wasn't a veiled insult or anything :) I just
truly want to know why people would still use that particular
convention with modern OO languages and IDEs. Visual
Hi,
> While you can make that argument for the Interface, the 'm_' prefix is
> necessary in order to write .NET code that is portable between C# and
> languages that do not support a "_" prefix for class level fields. Hence,
> the "m_" (a hold over from when the 'm' denoted 'module')
or don't tr
