Nobody can answer that?
On Thursday, February 28, 2013, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> OK guys, thank you for your feedback. I'll provide those patches, but
> it is difficult sometimes to keep up with them because the source code
> in trunk changes and patches may conflict (it happened
P and webdav
parts? You could need my help ;)
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> Hello Jean-Marc
>>
>>
>> 2013/2/28 Jean-Marc Borer
>>
>>> Jörg, I am new to this
Jörg, I am new to this list and project. I have actively contributed
to VFS especially to the HTTP and Webdav parts. When I file an issue
or a request for improvement, I also publish a patch.
Where can I find the information if my patch will be
accepted/integrated in which version and when it is p
Fine for me
Jean-Marc
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Jörg Schaible
wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> the current implementation of the UserAuthenticationData only allows us to
> keep character arrays as values for the user authentication. However, for
> FTPS or SFTP (maybe more - HTTPS, WebDAVS) we ma
Hi all,
WebDAV seems to always include the parent folder when returning a list
of children for a directory. In VFS, it is checked that a folder is
empty before allowing to delete it. However with WebDAV, all empty
dirs return one entry (themselfs) which denies the deletion of the
directory. Anyone
Hi all,
I've noticed that when you try to get a directory list with WebDAV it
ALWAYS include the parent folder in its first entry. For example, when
you try to list items from an empty dir, WebDAV returns you one entry
with the folder itself.
In VFS, this prevents the deletion of the directory si
And the tests that rely on internet: I have to use a web proxy with
authentication that seems not to work in the units tests...
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Now it is fine. Let's see the remaining issues now. The only problem
> that remains is my corporate
Now it is fine. Let's see the remaining issues now. The only problem
that remains is my corporate anti virus that will prevent the usage of
some ports...
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Hmm. My trunk build fails:
>
> Failed to execute goal on project commo
not happen with the tagged version. I have to check why I
miss these dependencieses (I use a repo proxy)
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 3:04 PM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> I am currently trying to build trunk.
>
> What I can say already is that I needed to patch VFS 2.0 from tag
> (common-vfs2..
sues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12567150/vfs-369-JR-2.5.3.diff
> - Run "mvn clean test"
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
>
>> Yup. Already fixed these issues in my code.
>>
>> For example:
>
Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Can you address the failure in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-369?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
>
>> There are some adaptations to do, but then it works flawlessly
There are some adaptations to do, but then it works flawlessly with my
tests and WebDAV repositories.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> Hello list guys,
>
> Has anyone something to say against updating the Jackrabbit version
> used in Commons VFS?
>
>
Hello list guys,
Has anyone something to say against updating the Jackrabbit version
used in Commons VFS?
There will be some small adaptations but 1.5.2 is becoming quiet old
now. Any counter arguments?
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
-
To
question: from which version of VFS should I provide a patch?
trunk? tag? branch?
Cheers,
Jean-Marc
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-453
>
> Patch will come soon
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Benedikt Ritte
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-453
Patch will come soon
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi Jean-Marc,
>
>
> 2013/2/6 Jean-Marc Borer
>
>> OK. You seem to like the feature.
>>
>> Can I provide the patch for integrati
I found this entry in JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-249
Actually it is not true that it is fixed. Looking at the code Ralph
Goers's explanation are not correct. It should be reopened.
I will create a new entry.
On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jean-Marc Borer wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Gary Gregory
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Sure, make sure you base you patch on the latest from trunk.
>> > >
>> > > Gary
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tu
Hello list members,
We need to be able to specify socket timeouts in VFS for HTTP and
WebDAV in our project so that request will no hang for ever in certain
conditions.
I have modified the sources of HttpFileSystemConfigBuilder and
HttpClientFactory to be able to configure this in HttpClient.
D
Hello guys,
I am using the VFS api and was rather surprised that when you resolve
a HTTP URL, you get a HttpFileObject that always responds "true" to
writable instead of "false"... When you ask the FileSystem
capabilities it obviously answers false to any write actions.
Looking at the code HttpFi
19 matches
Mail list logo
