I'd say compile low and run high.
So unless there is really something you need from Java 17 or 21, why not
compiling lower?
It would open the release to be used more widely in my opinion.
Now I agree that making sure it runs on java 17 and 21 at least is great.
Le ven. 21 juil. 2023, 18:40, Glav
Hi,
Jakarta Mail is under vote at the minute and should go out hopefully in a
few days.
https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakarta.ee-spec/msg00788.html
Some work has been done on the Apache Geronimo side of things recently. Not
sure about the status though.
Le jeu. 3 sept. 2020 à 17:52, Xeno Amess
Thanks Romain for pushing this release so hard.
I have yank JCS from my project and replaced with another impl.
Thanks anyway.
Le dim. 24 déc. 2017 à 10:23, Romain Manni-Bucau a
écrit :
> My own +1 (dont think the issues we found are worth blocking a release but
> would be happy to get help to
egory :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > JCS 2.2 is out already: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-jcs/
> >
> > Do you mean the _next_ release?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >
> > wrote:
> >
>
Hi,
I am currently facing performance issues with the CDI integration because
of the reflection.
I have successfully tested the patch from Romain and would like to know if
there is a maintenance release planned soon?
Thanks
Jean-Louis
Overall agree with the feedback.
I may have missed some emails in the thread, but did we get another email
from Norman to provide us with a bit more information?
Again I might have missed it. Apologies if so.
Jean-Louis
Le jeu 29 oct. 2015 06:34, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> Thanks, Dave.
>
> Instr
See comments here after.
Le 4 nov. 2014 17:09, "Emmanuel Bourg" a écrit :
>
> Le 04/11/2014 15:55, Jochen Wiedmann a écrit :
>
> > Any feedback welcome.
>
> Hi Jochen,
>
> I'm not a dependency injection expert so I can't really comment on the
> design, I could just make trivial observations like
Hey guys,
As Gary, I did also some AOP tricks to gather information from POOL and
DBCP.
It works fine, but agree that some more configurable logging would help.
In regards to the right logging implementation or the right facade to use,
I'd say, none.
Why not just using JUL?
It comes from the JDK
JLouis
2014-05-02 7:07 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau :
> Hey JL, nice to know better to have details ;). When I checked yesterday
> Mark didnt commit his work and the missing parts of my patch which should
> be merged so I guess it will be fixed soon.
> Le 1 mai 2014 23:18, "Je
I have a compilation issue FYI, either with jdk6 or jdk7
JLouis
2014-05-01 18:43 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg :
> Hi!
>
> I've looked at Continuum and it seems like it fails since weeks now.
>
> Anyone successfully did run it with jdk-1.6?
>
>
> If so, we should rather look at the Continuum config.
gt;>>>
> > >>>> 2014-04-25 14:24 GMT+02:00 Siegfried Goeschl :
> > >>>>> Hi folks,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> don't know the official view of things (current ASF Git support)
> but
> > I use
> > >>>
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
> 2014-04-22 9:41 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO :
> > +1, that'd be awesome.
> > I don't think it's a big word/rework. Crossing fingers, it's just a
> matter
>
+1, that'd be awesome.
I don't think it's a big word/rework. Crossing fingers, it's just a matter
of some interfaces and an SPI to implement.
JLouis
2014-04-21 20:39 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl :
> On 21.04.14 19:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > saw it, I can rephrase the question this way: will
Hi Jochen,
Well summarized.
And I think you figured out what the real problem is.
We could work as in Incubator, isn't it?
Having one big umbrella and real subprojects.
JLouis
2013/10/7 Jochen Wiedmann
> I believe that the problem is Commons structure. To have one big project
> which such
+1, looks like there are plenty of examples.
Agree with Phil, how could we make things lighter or easier?
I mean to get more release out.
Jean-Louis
2013/10/6 Phil Steitz
>
>
> > On Oct 6, 2013, at 1:11 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > Am 06.10.2013 21:44, schrieb Chri
Hey guys,
I don't want to interrupt such an interesting discussion.
I just wanted to fix a typo I caught up.
If creating a constant with the right javadoc is ok, let's just do it,
there is no big issue on that.
Lemme me know if the following works.
jlmonteiro$ svn ci -m "Adding a constant for th
Apologize for the late answer.
Not sure to understand the purpose of the request.
Could you detail cause it's not used anywhere else?
JLouis
2013/10/3 sebb
> On 2 October 2013 21:12, wrote:
> > Author: jlmonteiro
> > Date: Wed Oct 2 20:12:29 2013
> > New Revision: 1528612
> >
> > URL: http:
Works fine.
Commit #1519417
Thanks again.
Jean-Louis
2013/9/2 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO
> Thanks a lot.
> Yes, gonna try to push a small fix.
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> 2013/9/2 Luc Maisonobe
>
>> Le 02/09/2013 13:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit :
>> > Hi guys
Thanks a lot.
Yes, gonna try to push a small fix.
Jean-Louis
2013/9/2 Luc Maisonobe
> Le 02/09/2013 13:14, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO a écrit :
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I've been working on Apache Commons Monitoring (from the sandbox/trunk).
> > I did some fixes and wo
Hi guys,
I've been working on Apache Commons Monitoring (from the sandbox/trunk).
I did some fixes and would like to push others.
I'm also working on a new feature.
After discussing with Romain and Mark, they asked me to push a mail here.
Would it be possible to get write access to the sandbox su
Hi guys,
any news ?
Jean-Louis
Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As discussed here some weeks ago in OpenEJB dev's list, I finally decided
> to add this feature in commons dbcp because it seemed to me more relevant
> (instead of having it in OpenEJB itself).
>
Hi,
As discussed here some weeks ago in OpenEJB dev's list, I finally decided to
add this feature in commons dbcp because it seemed to me more relevant
(instead of having it in OpenEJB itself).
Any feedback ?
Jean-Louis
-Message d'origine-
De : Jean-Louis MONTEIRO (JIRA)
22 matches
Mail list logo
