Please anyone could confirm if the actual results are intended or not,
thanks!
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Hoat Le wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some concerns regarding of *Validate* class with the case of null
> pointer exceptions. I see that there are some misleading messages, f
on the expected NullPointerException, please consider my
attached patch for this issue; there are duplicated code in *Validate*
class, and some unit test parts for *ValidateTest* are not relevant, too.
Thanks and best regards!
--
Hoat Le [hoatle.net]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
Please anyone could confirm the actual results below (from my previous
email) are intended or not? :(
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Hoat Le wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some concerns regarding of *Validate* class with the case of null
> pointer exceptions. I see that there are som
Hello,
org.apache.commons
commons-lang3
3.0
Commons Lang
As maven convention, we should use 3.0-SNAPSHOT for development-version
(trunk here). I don't think we should use 3.0 here which is considered as a
released version? Or any reason for doing that?
Thanks!
--
Hoat Le [hoatle.net]
te some distros (Debian, Gentoo, ...) and
> vendors (jBoss) that will always build on their own. Can we ensure that the
> Ant build will always create the same artifacts?
>
> - Jörg
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Hoat Le [hoatle.net]
