think that attach handlers with specific exception types
>> could
>> be a problem when you have a method that throws exceptions of different
>> kinds. I don't think that it could be specified (in a elegant way) in
>> annotations. Maybe it preferable to let it more gen
gt; I believe that the strategy of rethrowing an exception or not must be
> accomplished by the caller method, and exceptions inside the handler must
> be
> tackled there. Maybe a (new) parameter could specify what to do.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Andre
>
>
>
> --
I just want to take the discussion towards converting compile time weaving
to load time weaving for a second here. Please feel free to correct me if
I have gone off the wrong path here.
My idea is to simply have something like this:
1. apply throws advice on every method which has the annotation
2.
